Studies in Classic American Literature — John Shaqi
Studies in Classic American LiteratureLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
History
Studies in Classic American Literature
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
American literature -- History and criticism
Two bodies of modern literature seem to me to have come to a real verge:
the Russian and the American. Let us leave aside the more brittle bits
of French or Marinetti or Irish production, which are perhaps over the
verge. Russian and American. And by American I do not mean Sherwood
Anderson, who is so Russian. I mean the old people, little thin volumes
of Hawthorne, Poe, Dana, Melville, Whitman. These seem to me to have
reached a verge, as the more voluminous Tolstoi, Dostoevsky, Chekhov,
Artzibashev reached a limit on the other side. The furthest frenzies of
French modernism or futurism have not yet reached the pitch of extreme
consciousness that Poe, Melville, Hawthorne, Whitman reached. The
European moderns are all _trying_ to be extreme. The great Americans I
mention just were it. Which is why the world has funked them, and funks
them to-day.
The great difference between the extreme Russians and the extreme
American lies in the fact that the Russians are explicit and hate
eloquence and symbols, seeing in these only subterfuge, whereas the
Americans refuse everything explicit and always put up a sort of double
meaning. They revel in subterfuge. They prefer their truth safely
swaddled in an ark of bulrushes, and deposited among the reeds until
some friendly Egyptian princess comes to rescue the babe.
Well, it's high time now that someone came to lift out the swaddled
infant of truth that America spawned some time back. The child must be
getting pretty thin, from neglect.
I. THE SPIRIT OF PLACE
We like to think of the old-fashioned American classics as children's
books. Just childishness, on our part.
The old American art-speech contains an alien quality, which belongs to
the American continent and to nowhere else. But, of course, so long as
we insist on reading the books as children's tales, we miss all that.
One wonders what the proper high-brow Romans of the third and fourth or
later centuries read into the strange utterances of Lucretius or
Apuleius or Tertullian, Augustine or Athanasius. The uncanny voice of
Iberian Spain, the weirdness of old Carthage, the passion of Libya and
North Africa; you may bet the proper old Romans never heard these at
all. They read old Latin inference over the top of it, as we read old
European inference over the top of Poe or Hawthorne.
It is hard to hear a new voice, as hard as it is to listen to an unknown
language. We just don't listen. There is a new voice in the old American
classics. The world has declined to hear it, and has blabbed about
children's stories.
Why?--Out of fear. The world fears a new experience more than it fears
anything. Because a new experience displaces so many old experiences.
And it is like trying to use muscles that have perhaps never been used,
or that have been going stiff for ages. It hurts horribly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account