Studies in Classic American LiteratureLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
History
Studies in Classic American Literature
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
American literature -- History and criticism
The world doesn't fear a new idea. It can pigeon-hole any idea. But it
can't pigeon-hole a real new experience. It can only dodge. The world is
a great dodger, and the Americans the greatest. Because they dodge their
own very selves.
There is a new feeling in the old American books, far more than there is
in the modern American books, which are pretty empty of any feeling, and
proud of it. There is a "different" feeling in the old American
classics. It is the shifting over from the old psyche to something new,
a displacement. And displacements hurt. This hurts. So we try to tie it
up, like a cut finger. Put a rag around it.
It is a cut, too. Cutting away the old emotions and consciousness. Don't
ask what is left.
Art-speech is the only truth. An artist is usually a damned liar, but
his art, if it be art, will tell you the truth of his day. And that is
all that matters. Away with eternal truth. Truth lives from day to day,
and the marvellous Plato of yesterday is chiefly bosh to-day.
The old American artists were hopeless liars. But they were artists, in
spite of themselves. Which is more than you can say of most living
practitioners.
And you can please yourself, when you read _The Scarlet Letter_, whether
you accept what that sugary, blue-eyed little darling of a Hawthorne has
to say for himself, false as all darlings are, or whether you read the
impeccable truth of his art-speech.
The curious thing about art-speech is that it prevaricates so terribly,
I mean it tells such lies. I suppose because we always all the time tell
ourselves lies. And out of a pattern of lies art weaves the truth. Like
Dostoevsky posing as a sort of Jesus, but most truthfully revealing
himself all the while as a little horror.
Truly art is a sort of subterfuge. But thank God for it, we can see
through the subterfuge if we choose. Art has two great functions. First,
it provides an emotional experience. And then, if we have the courage of
our own feelings, it becomes a mine of practical truth. We have had the
feelings _ad nauseam._ But we've never dared dig the actual truth out of
them, the truth that concerns us, whether it concerns our grandchildren
or not.
The artist usually sets out--or used to--to point a moral and adorn a
tale. The tale, however, points the other way, as a rule. Two blankly
opposing morals, the artist's and the tale's. Never trust the artist.
Trust the tale. The proper functions of a critic is to save the tale
from the artist who created it.
Now we know our business in these studies; saving the American tale from
the American artist.
Let us look at this American artist first. How did he ever get to
America, to start with? Why isn't he a European still, like his father
before him?
Now listen to me, don't listen to him. He'll tell you the lie you
expect. Which is partly your fault for expecting it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account