Studies in Classic American Literature — John Shaqi
Studies in Classic American LiteratureLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
History
Studies in Classic American Literature
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
American literature -- History and criticism
When Adam went and took Eve, _after_ the apple, he didn't do any more
than he had done many a time before, in act. But in consciousness he did
something very different. So did Eve. Each of them kept an eye on what
they were doing, they watched what was happening to them. They wanted to
KNOW. And that was the birth of sin. Not _doing_ it, but KNOWING about
it. Before the apple, they had shut their eyes and their minds had gone
dark. Now, they peeped and pried and imagined. They watched themselves.
And they felt uncomfortable after. They felt self-conscious. So they
said, "The _act_ is sin. Let's hide. We've sinned."
No wonder the Lord kicked them out of the Garden. Dirty hypocrites.
The sin was the self-watching, self-consciousness. The sin, and the
doom. Dirty understanding.
Nowadays men do hate the idea of dualism. It's no good, dual we are. The
Cross. If we accept the symbol, then, virtually, we accept the fact. We
are divided against ourselves.
For instance, the blood _hates_ being KNOWN by the mind. It feels itself
destroyed when it is KNOWN. Hence the profound instinct of privacy.
And on the other hand, the mind and the spiritual consciousness of man
simply _hates_ the dark potency of blood-acts: hates the genuine dark
sensual orgasms, which do, for the time being, actually obliterate the
mind and the spiritual consciousness, plunge them in a suffocating flood
of darkness.
You can't get away from this.
Blood-consciousness overwhelms, obliterates, and annuls
mind-consciousness.
Mind-consciousness extinguishes blood-consciousness, and consumes the
blood.
We are all of us conscious in both ways. And the two ways are
antagonistic in us.
They will always remain so.
That is our cross.
The antagonism is so obvious, and so far-reaching, that it extends to
the smallest thing. The cultured, highly-conscious person of to-day
_loathes_ any form of physical, "menial" work: such as washing dishes or
sweeping a floor or chopping wood. This menial work is an insult to the
spirit. "When I see men carrying heavy loads, doing brutal work, it
always makes me want to cry," said a beautiful, cultured woman to me.
"When you say that, it makes me want to beat you," said I, in reply.
"When I see you with your beautiful head pondering heavy thoughts, I
just want to hit you. It outrages me."
My father hated books, hated the sight of anyone reading or writing.
My mother hated the thought that any of her sons should be condemned to
manual labour. Her sons must have something higher than that.
She won. But she died first.
He laughs longest who laughs last.
There is a basic hostility in all of us between the physical and the
mental, the blood and the spirit. The mind is "ashamed" of the blood.
And the blood is destroyed by the mind, actually. Hence pale-faces.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account