Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
The wars of the future, so the halfpenny journalists inform us, will be
either waged under the seas or above the clouds, and we seem to be
approaching the time imagined by Lord Tennyson, whose swain (in
“Locksley Hall”)—
“Heard the heavens filled with shouting, and there rain’d a ghastly dew
From the nations’ airy navies grappling in the central blue.”
If wars ever die out, it will certainly _not_ be owing to the
destructive capabilities of the weapons employed. In the eyes of old
Geoffrey de Vinesauf the naval conflicts of his time were as terrible as
he could well imagine them to be, but a hundred years hence a Conference
will doubtless be held at Tokyo to consider what restrictions should be
placed on the use of submarine boats and aerial machines in time of war.
Those who are in favour of utilising the latest resources of science for
the purpose of warfare are in reality more humane in the truest sense of
the word than those who seek to limit nations in their choice of
weapons. Vice-Admiral Sir John Fisher, who was one of those chosen to
represent Great Britain at the Hague Conference, expressed himself
strongly on the cruelty of making war on “humane” or moderate
principles, and it is an undoubted fact that in spite of the deadly
nature of modern arms, wars, on land at least, are not so destructive of
life nor do they cause so much misery and suffering as they did
formerly.
We can speak with more certainty with regard to warfare on land than we
can to warfare on sea, but though the next great naval fight between two
nations will certainly entail terrible suffering on the combatants
(especially on those whose stations are below), it may be said that on
the whole they will neither cause such wholesale misery nor be so
protracted as the naval battles of old.
“Every war,” said Captain Herbert in a recent lecture at the Royal
United Service Institution on “The Ethics of Warfare,” “marks a step. In
1885 the Servians, when they invaded Bulgaria, paid conscientiously in
good coin for every fowl or pig seized in farmhouses, for every glass of
brandy drunk in village inns; and when the tables were turned, and the
Bulgarians invaded Servia, the Bulgarian soldiers and the Servian
traders fraternised most cordially in the alehouses of Pirot. To come to
the latest European war—that between Turkey and Greece in 1897—we have
the testimony of the war correspondents that the behaviour of the
Ottoman soldiery was quite exemplary. If things continue in this wise we
shall perchance hear in the next century of every rifle discharge being
preceded by a conciliatory caution and every bursted shell being
followed by a humble apology.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account