·-------·
|(O)|(I)|
|---|---|
|(I)| |
·-------·
Here we get _two_ Conclusions, viz.
"All x are y';
All y are x'."
pg063
And these, translated into concrete form, are
"All diligent students are (not-ignorant, i.e.) learned;
All ignorant students are (not-diligent, i.e.) idle".
(See p. 4.)
(4)
"Of the prisoners who were put on their trial at the last
Assizes, all, against whom the verdict 'guilty' was
returned, were sentenced to imprisonment;
Some, who were sentenced to imprisonment, were also
sentenced to hard labour".
Let Univ. be "the prisoners who were put on their trial at the
last Assizes"; m = who were sentenced to imprisonment;
x = against whom the verdict 'guilty' was returned; y = who were
sentenced to hard labour.
The Premisses, translated into abstract form, are
"All x are m;
Some m are y".
Breaking up the first, we get the three
(1) "Some x are m;
(2) No x are m';
(3) Some m are y".
Representing these, in the order 2, 1, 3, on a Triliteral
Diagram, we get
·---------------·
|(O) | (O)|
| ·---|---· |
| | (I) | |
|---|(I)|---|---|
| | | | |
| ·---|---· |
| | |
·---------------·
Here we get no Conclusion at all.
You would very likely have guessed, if you had seen _only_ the
Premisses, that the Conclusion would be
"Some, against whom the verdict 'guilty' was returned,
were sentenced to hard labour".
But this Conclusion is not even _true_, with regard to the
Assizes I have here invented.
"Not _true!_" you exclaim. "Then who _were_ they, who were
sentenced to imprisonment and were also sentenced to hard
labour? They _must_ have had the verdict 'guilty' returned
against them, or how could they be sentenced?"
Well, it happened like _this_, you see. They were three
ruffians, who had committed highway-robbery. When they were put
on their trial, they _pleaded_ 'guilty'. So no _verdict_ was
returned at all; and they were sentenced at once.]
I will now work out, in their briefest form, as models for the Reader to
imitate in working examples, the above four concrete Problems.
pg064
(1) [see p. 60]
"No son of mine is dishonest;
People always treat an honest man with respect."
Univ. "men"; m = honest; x = my sons; y = treated with respect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account