Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Morell, Philos. Religion, 128-131, 143—“The Bible cannot in strict
accuracy of language be called a revelation, since a revelation
always implies an actual process of intelligence in a living
mind.” F. W. Newman, Phases of Faith, 152—“Of our moral and
spiritual God we know nothing without—everything within.” Theodore
Parker: “Verbal revelation can never communicate a simple idea
like that of God, Justice, Love, Religion”; see review of Parker
in Bib. Sac., 18:24-27. James Martineau, Seat of Authority in
Religion: “As many minds as there are that know God at first hand,
so many revealing acts there have been, and as many as know him at
second hand are strangers to revelation”; so, assuming external
revelation to be impossible, Martineau subjects all the proofs of
such revelation to unfair destructive criticism. Pfleiderer,
Philos. Religion, 1:185—“As all revelation is originally an
_inner_ living experience, the springing up of religious truth in
the heart, no external event can belong in itself to revelation,
no matter whether it be naturally or supernaturally brought
about.” Professor George M. Forbes: “Nothing can be revealed to us
which we do not grasp with our reason. It follows that, so far as
reason acts normally, it is a part of revelation.” Ritchie, Darwin
and Hegel, 30—“The revelation of God is the growth of the idea of
God.”
In reply to this objection, urged mainly by idealists in philosophy, (_a_)
We grant that revelation, to be effective, must be the means of inducing a
new mode of intelligence, or in other words, must be understood. We grant
that this understanding of divine things is impossible without a
quickening of man’s cognitive powers. We grant, moreover, that revelation,
when originally imparted, was often internal and subjective.
Matheson, Moments on the Mount, 51-53, on _Gal. 1:16—_“to reveal
his Son in me”: “The revelation on the way to Damascus would not
have enlightened Paul, had it been merely a vision to his eye.
Nothing can be revealed _to_ us which has not been revealed _in_
us. The eye does not see the beauty of the landscape, nor the ear
hear the beauty of music. So flesh and blood do not reveal Christ
to us. Without the teaching of the Spirit, the external facts will
be only like the letters of a book to a child that cannot read.”
We may say with Channing: “I am more sure that my rational nature
is from God, than that any book is the expression of his will.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account