Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 3 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Many of the mystics, as Schwenkfeld, Weigel, Sebastian Frank, held
to an _essential_ union between Christ and the believer. One of
Weigel’s followers, therefore, could say to another: “I am Christ
Jesus, the living Word of God; I have redeemed thee by my sinless
sufferings.” We are ever to remember that the indwelling of Christ
only puts the believer more completely in possession of himself,
and makes him more conscious of his own personality and power.
Union with Christ must be taken in connection with the other truth
of the personality and activity of the Christian; otherwise it
tends to pantheism. Martineau, Study, 2:190—“In nature it is God’s
immanent life, in morals it is God’s transcendent life, with which
we commune.”
Angelus Silesius, a German philosophical poet (1624‐1677),
audaciously wrote: “I know God cannot live an instant without me;
He must give up the ghost, if I should cease to be.” Lowde, a
disciple of Malebranche, used the phrase “Godded with God, and
Christed with Christ,” and Jonathan Edwards, in his Religious
Affections, quotes it with disapprobation, saying that “the saints
do not become actually partakers of the divine essence, as would
be inferred from this abominable and blasphemous language of
heretics” (Allen, Jonathan Edwards, 224). “Self is not a mode of
the divine: it is a principle of isolation. In order to religion,
I must have a will to surrender.... ‘Our wills are ours, to make
them thine.’... Though the self is, in _knowledge_, a principle of
unification; in _existence_, or metaphysically, it is a principle
of isolation” (Seth).
Inge, Christian Mysticism, 30—“Some of the mystics went astray by
teaching a real _substitution_ of the divine for human nature,
thus depersonalizing man—a fatal mistake, for without human
personality we cannot conceive of divine personality.” Lyman
Abbott: “In Christ, God and man are united, not as the river is
united with the sea, losing its personality therein, but as the
child is united with the father, or the wife with the husband,
whose personality and individuality are strengthened and increased
by the union.” Here Dr. Abbott’s view comes as far short of the
truth as that of the mystics goes beyond the truth. As we shall
see, the union of the believer with Christ is a vital union,
surpassing in its intimacy any union of souls that we know. The
union of child with father, or of wife with husband, is only a
pointer which hints very imperfectly at the interpenetrating and
energizing of the human spirit by the divine.
(_d_) A union mediated and conditioned by participation of the sacraments
of the church,—as held by Romanists, Lutherans, and High‐Church
Episcopalians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account