Tent Work in Palestine: A Record of Discovery and AdventureConder, C. R. (Claude Reignier)
History
Tent Work in Palestine: A Record of Discovery and Adventure
Conder, C. R. (Claude Reignier)
Palestine -- Description and travel
The great walls are surmounted by two high white minarets on the
south-east and north-west. The southern portion of the area is occupied
by a Gothic twelfth-century building, presumably a church; the nave has
a pointed roof and clerestory windows, the aisles are lower and their
roofs rest against the fortress wall. Within are the cenotaphs of Isaac
and Rebecca, supposed to stand above their true graves in the cavern.
Outside the building, in separate chambers, are the tombs of Abraham and
Sarah, flanking the entrance. On the north side of the open court Jacob
and Leah have similar cenotaphs, covered, like the rest, with richly
embroidered green cloths. A modern building is erected against the
western fortress wall on the exterior. This is called the Tomb of
Joseph, whose bones are said, by Josephus, to have been removed hither
from Shechem--a story no doubt due to Jewish jealousy of the shrine at
Shechem, which was in the hands of the Samaritans.
Cenotaphs like those in the present building are mentioned as early as
700 A.D. Rabbi Benjamin of Tudela states, however, that Jews were able
in his days to descend, through an iron door, into the cavern, which was
in three compartments, and where the real tombs were shown. The
twelfth-century writers, in describing the fortress, which they quaintly
name the “Castle of St. Abraham,” also call the cavern Spelunca Duplex,
“the double cave”--a title probably derived from the Hebrew Machpelah,
signifying “the place divided”: Sir John Maundeville, in 1322, states
that one chamber was above the other.
An idea appears to have existed at an early period that Hebron was not
originally built on its present site, but on the hill north-west of the
modern town. Arculphus mentions this in 700 A.D., and Marino Sanuto in
the fourteenth century says the same, both apparently referring to
ancient ruins then visible in the direction of the present site of
Abraham’s Oak. There are traces of the same theory in the writings of
many intermediate visitors, and the Bible narrative itself seems to
require a position opposite the Haram, if the true Machpelah be beneath
that enclosure, for the cave was not in Hebron, but in a field “before
Mamre--the same is Hebron” (Gen. xxiii. 19). Thus, though a new city may
have grown up around the sacred tombs, even in Jewish times, the
original Hebron, Mamre, or Kirjath-Arba of Abraham, must have had a
different site; and it may be noted, that the principal springs, and
many of the rock-cut tombs dating from the Jewish period, are now found
north-west of Hebron.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account