Secondly, the prosecution had not shown that at the time the woman made the statement she was in expectation of immediate death. The judge held (1) That the prosecution had not proved that in her own opinion the woman was beyond all hope of recovery, and that therefore the statement was inadmissible; (2) That such a statement--the magistrate asking her questions and the doctor taking down only her answers in writing--was not admissible as a dying declaration. In the case of Rex _v._ Holloway, 65 J.P. 712 (Wills, J., Central Criminal Court). The prisoner threw a burning lamp at his stepson and set fire to his stepdaughter, who succumbed to the burns she received. A deposition of the deceased girl was taken down by a magistrate. At the time it was taken it was intended that it should be in accordance with the provisions of the 1867 Act. The accused was present and had full opportunity of cross-examining the witness. The deposition was read over to the girl, and she assented to it, but could not sign it because of the injuries to her hands. The magistrate who took the deposition signed it. It was held that the deposition had been taken in accordance with the provisions of the Indictable Offences Act, 1848, sec. 17, and was admissible though it had not been signed by the girl. The validity of a dying declaration has been called in question when made by a person who has suffered a severe concussion of the brain, and then recovered his sensibility. It is well known that under such circumstances the recollection of what took place before or after the injury is in many cases very imperfect, and the injured party may thus draw unintentionally upon his imagination for his facts. In Scotland, “the written deposition of a person who is dead is admissible, whether the person were the party injured or not, if he would have been a competent witness. It is not necessary that the deceased believe himself to be dying when he emits the deposition, for his consciousness of approaching death may be inferred from the nature of the wound, or the state of illness or other circumstances of the case. Such depositions are generally taken by a magistrate, but a declaration deliberately made, though without an oath, and taken down ‘by a creditable person,’ is admissible” (Macdonald, _Scottish Criminal Law_, p. 512). 2. ORAL OR PAROL