That Marvel—The Movie: A Glance at Its Past, Its Promising Present and Its Significant FutureVan Zile, Edward S. (Edward Sims)
History
That Marvel—The Movie: A Glance at Its Past, Its Promising Present and Its Significant Future
Van Zile, Edward S. (Edward Sims)
Motion pictures
It is a safe bet that the majority of my readers can remember the time
when they looked upon motion pictures with a mingling of contempt and
impatience, realizing vaguely, perhaps, the promise the screen suggested
of better things but disgusted with its seemingly stubborn adherence to
cheap claptrap, crude melodrama, and unspeakably vulgar farce. My
personal experience in connection with the movies is, I imagine, typical
of that which has come to thousands of Americans during the past quarter
of a century. I can still remember the thrill I experienced when I first
gazed upon human beings in motion screened by a camera. What the
photographed puppets did was not, at the moment, of great consequence.
The mere fact that they came and went, walked, ran, danced before my
eyes was startling enough. I was fascinated by a scientific achievement
that was of itself sufficiently interesting to warrant my presence in
that audience of long ago.
But my subsequent activities as a movie fan in embryo were of short
duration. Like thousands of my fellow Americans, I came, I saw, but I
did not conquer—in fact, I was repelled. For years thereafter I avoided
the movie palaces, realizing that I was temperamentally unfitted to
enjoy optical contacts with adultery, murder, theft and sudden death.
Nor was my sense of humor of a kind that found anything to laugh at in
squash-pie farce.
But even the cupidity and stupidity that had their effect upon the
screen in its earlier years could not kill the goose that was destined
eventually to lay something better than golden eggs. Though ignorance,
avarice and vulgarity for many years influenced, to too great an extent,
the movies, they could not destroy its inherent power of regeneration,
nor the cumulative force exercised by the higher type of producers which
eventually made that regeneration possible. How the screen was saved
from becoming the exclusive property of the underworld by the survival
of the fittest, or the most enlightened, of the early promoters, will be
told presently, but it is interesting, at this juncture, to discuss for
a moment the question as to why its earlier career was so deplorably
reprehensible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account