There are irregularities in the periodicity of the elements, which we
are only now beginning to understand. The second and third periods,
which each contain eight elements, are quite regular; the first element
in the one is like the first in the other, the second like the second
and so on. But the fourth period has 18 elements, so that its elements
cannot correspond one by one to those of the third period. There are
eight elements with new properties (the 21st to the 28th), and others
in which the correspondence is not exact. The fifth period corresponds
regularly, element for element, with the fourth, which is possible
because both contain 18 elements. But in the sixth period there are 36
elements, and 16 of these (the “rare earths” as they are called) do not
correspond to any of the elements in earlier periods. Niels Bohr, in
the book mentioned above, has offered ingenious explanations of these
apparent irregularities, which are still more or less hypothetical, but
are probably in the main correct. Some very important facts, however,
[Pg 20]
remain quite unexplained, notably the fact that iron and the two
neighbouring elements have magnetic properties which are different in a
remarkable way from those of all other elements.
The atomic weight of the earlier elements (except hydrogen) is double,
or one more than double, the atomic number. Thus helium, the second
element, has the atomic weight 4; lithium, the third, has the atomic
weight 7 (very nearly); oxygen, the eighth, has the atomic weight 16.
But after the 20th element the atomic weight becomes increasingly more
than double the atomic number. For instance, silver, the 47th element,
has atomic weight 107.88; gold, the 79th, has atomic weight 197.2;
uranium, the 92nd, has atomic weight 238.2.
It is remarkable that X-ray spectra, which were unknown until a few
years ago, show a perfectly regular progression throughout the whole
series of elements, even in those cases where the order of the periodic
table departs from the order of the atomic weights. This is a striking
confirmation of the correctness of the order that has been adopted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account