to describe the orbits which Sommerfeld admits as possible, in addition
to Bohr’s circles.
If there is any reader who does not know what an ellipse looks like,
he can construct one for himself by the following simple device. Tie
[Pg 74]
a piece of string to two pins, and stick them into a piece of paper at
two points , ′ near enough together for the string to remain
loose. Then take a pencil, and with its point draw the string taut. Any
place that the pencil will reach is on a certain ellipse, and by
moving the pencil round, the whole ellipse can be drawn. The points
, ′ are called “foci.” An ellipse may be defined as a curve
such that, if and ′ are any two points on it the sum of the
distance of from and ′ (the foci) is equal to the sum
of the distances of ′ from and ′. In our construction,
both are equal to the length of the string that we tied to the two
pins. The ratio of the distance between the pins to the length of the
string is called the “eccentricity” of the ellipse. It is obvious that
if we were to stick the two pins into the same place we should get a
circle, so that a circle is a particular case of an ellipse, namely an
ellipse which has zero eccentricity. All the planets move in ellipses
which are very nearly circles, whereas the comets move in ellipses
which are very far removed from circles. In each case the sun is in one
of the foci, and there is nothing particular in the other focus. An
ellipse which is very far from being a circle can be drawn by making
the distance ′ between the two pins not very much shorter than
[Pg 75]
the length of the string.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account