The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school product — John Shaqi
The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school productFranzen, Raymond
Science
The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school product
Franzen, Raymond
Ability -- Testing; Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements
Fourth, our eugenic needs demand it, since we are not conserving this,
our chiefest asset, genius. Unless we conserve better these rare
products, the standard deviation of the intelligence of humanity will
keep shrinking as we select against imbeciles and against genius as well.
The waste of a genius who becomes an intellectual dilettante, as many now
in fact do, is double. We lose what he might do for society; he does not
marry and we lose the potentiality of his highly endowed germ-plasm.
And they do become dilettantes when special treatment is not given. I
know of a young man who was first of his high-school class, who got all
A’s his first year in College (at Wisconsin), and all A’s his second year
(at Harvard); and then he began to read all manner of literature with
no schema of expression, no vocation, because, as he said, all college
courses are so stupidly easy. He attended no lectures and read none of
the books in one course, and then two days before the examination he was
taunted with not being able to pass this course. He spent two nights
and two days studying, and he received B in the course. But now he is a
failure because he has no organized, purposive schema of expression; he
was always in classes with people less fortunately endowed than he, and
so he never had a chance.
On these four counts then we must segregate our genius: (1) Social
exploitation of our resources. (2) Educational procedure for the sake of
other children as well as for them. (3) Happiness for them, organization
of their trends, and formation of social habits. (4) Biologic
conservation of great positive deviation from average human intelligence.
IS GENIUS SPECIALIZED?
This genius is of various kinds, political and business leaders,
scientists and artists. Have they then the same inherited nervous
structure with regard to abilities and capacities as distinct from
interests? We know that they must have something in common, something
that we call intelligence, power of adaptation. Calling this the nervous
chemistry, the way the nervous system acts its quality, we must still
know whether we have also an inherited nervous physics to deal with,
or a further inherited nervous chemistry which predisposes to specific
ability. Are there inherited capacities or predispositions to ability? We
are in a position to answer this question with regard to the elementary
school subjects, and are tempted here into a more general discussion of
the matter in hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account