The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school productFranzen, Raymond
Science
The accomplishment ratio : $b A treatment of the inherited determinants of disparity in school product
Franzen, Raymond
Ability -- Testing; Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements
Interpretation statistically of one thousand possible elements, simply
viewed as present or absent, and again simply viewed only as combinations
and not permutations, would mean that the less the intelligence the
more specific the inheritance. The most intelligent man alive could, by
what he is born with, do anything since he has all of the one thousand
factors, all of which help him in the prosecution of any venture. But
the fewer elements he has the less well he does most things, and when
lacking certain elements he has lost the capacity to do some things more
completely than others. (I have neglected physiological characteristics
necessary to an ability. A deaf man certainly is handicapped in music.
I speak of _possible_ mental capacities.) Such a view leaves scope for
some degree of special abilities. It accounts for the idiot-savants, it
accounts for the cases where genius is diverse as well as where it is
not though it would demand that specialized genius be very rare and that
inherited specialization be much rarer in the upper than in the lower
reaches of intelligence. It allows for such cases as Galileo, whose
father was a composer, as well as the cases cited by Galton. Heredity
need not imply the same kind of genius though it does suggest it, whereas
the environment backs up this inherited implication. We further can here
absolutely resent an inheritance of such things as ability in the common
school subjects without being involved in a view to deny the inheritance
of a predisposition to mechanical rather than musical successes.
Observation of brilliant children would corroborate this view. They can
do anything. Observation of the mentally deficient is equally encouraging
to this view. It has always been puzzling that they seem to do a few
things much better than others. According to this conception there
would be a negative correlation between intelligence and specialized
inheritance.
We will then consider each inherited element, not as music or as science,
but rather as an element of intelligence which will help in all lines of
work, but which may be a little more necessary for some than others. This
is a predisposition in a true sense. If a man had only one element out
of one thousand, he could do only a few things. If he had all thousand
he could do everything. Inheritance of ability is not in terms of units
valuable to us socially, but only in terms of undefined nervous elements;
and we may conceive of specialization, and still hold that there be less,
the more intelligent a man is.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account