The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern ConfederacyAbel, Annie Heloise
History
The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy
Abel, Annie Heloise
Indian Territory; Slavery -- United States; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
In the course of his official connection with the United States government
Elias Rector had frequently been accused of irregularities and even of
crookedness [General Files, _Southern Superintendency, 1859-1862_, C1222].
As touching the Seminole removal from Florida, he had much that was
peculiar to explain away. Apparently he quite frequently made queer
contracts, was given to making over-charges for mileage and to favoring
his friends at the expense of the Indians and of the government. In 1861,
he rendered a voucher showing he had paid a certain Henry Pape $6000.00
for building the Wichita Agency house. On various matters connected with
his official record, see Rector's _Letter Press Book_ and Indian Office,
_Letter Books_, no. 64, p. 342; no. 65, P. 49; no. 66, p. 26. In 1865,
Rector made application to be allowed to straighten out his accounts [J.
B. Luce to Cooley, November 2, 1865].
Returning, however, to the subject of Rector's incumbency: on the twelfth
of June, 1861, he wrote quite frankly to John Schoenmaker, principal of
the Osage Mission,
... I have no connection at this time with the Indian Department under
the old U. S. Government. I am now acting as Superintendent under the
Government of the Confederate States, and as no treaties have as yet
been concluded between the Southern confederacy and the tribes of
Indians with whom you are engaged I of course can say nothing to you
on the subject matter of your letter....--General Files, _Southern
Superintendency, 1859-1862_.
The Confederate southern superintendency had not at the time been filled,
but Rector seems to have been considered the most competent candidate.
Johnson, in recommending various men to Walker for various positions,
recommended Rector in strong terms of implied commendation,
Dr. Griffith wants to be appointed superintendent in place of E.
Rector. Do not allow this to be done. Hold everything as it is until
peace and unity are attained, and then make all the changes you think
proper; but not now--not now, by all manner of means.
I do earnestly beg you to keep your agencies as they were. They are
good and true men, and popular and qualified with the tribes and their
business. Restore and commission Elias Rector, superintendent; John
Crawford, Cherokee agent; William Quesenbury, Creek agent; Samuel M.
Rutherford, Seminole agent; and Matthew Leeper, Wichita agent; and if
Cooper has resigned (which I fear is the case), appoint Richard P.
Pulliam (who is the next best living man on earth for the place, I
believe) as agent of the Choctaws. With this programme you will have
peace and success; without it, no one can tell your troubles or our
misfortunes on this frontier....--_Official Records_, first ser., vol.
iii, 598.
[328] Dole to Robinson, April 9, 1861 [Indian Office, _Letter Book_, no.
65, 323].
[329] Dole to Rector, April 6, 1861 [--_ibid._, p. 317].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account