[266] Other analogies are undoubted, though less obvious. Thus in Cayapa, “man” is _liu-pula_; “woman,” _su-pula_. In these words, the terminal _pula_ is generic, and the prefixes are the Colorado _sona_, woman, abbreviated to _so_ in the Colorado itself, (see Dr. Seler’s article, p. 55); and the Col. _chilla_, male, which in the Spanish-American pronunciation, where _ll = y_, is close to _liu_. [267] Bollaert, _Antiquarian and Ethnological Researches_, p. 82. [268] Manuel I. Albis, in _Bulletin of the Amer. Ethnol. Soc._, vol. I., p. 52. [269] A. Codazzi in Felipe Perez, _Jeografia del Estado de Tolima_, pp. 81 sqq. (Bogota, 1863.) [270] As tooth, Andaqui, _sicoga_; Chibcha, _sica_. house, ” _co-joe_; ” _jüe_. [271] Manuel P. Albis, in _Bull. of the Amer. Ethnolog. Soc._, Vol. I., pp. 55, sq. See also General T. C. de Mosquera, _Memoir on the Physical and Political Geography of New Granada_, p. 41 (New York, 1853). [272] Garcilasso de la Vega, _Commentarios Reales_, Lib. VIII., cap. 5. He calls the natives Huancavillcas. [273] F. G. Saurez, _Estudio Historico sobre los Cañaris_ (Quito, 1878). This author gives cuts of these axes, and their inscribed devices. [274] For a description, with cuts, see M. L. Heuzey, “Le Trésor de Cuenca,” in _La Gazette des Beaux-Arts_, August, 1870. [275] _Cronica del Peru_, Pt. I., cap. cxvi. [276] _Comentarios Reales de los Incas_, Lib. VII., cap. 3. [277] _Antiquarian, Ethnological and other Researches, in New Granada, Ecuador, Peru and Chili_, p. 101 (London, 1860). [278] He complains that the languages which the Incas tried to suppress, had, since their downfall, arisen as vigorous as ever, _Comentarios Reales de los Incas_, Lib. VII., cap. 3. [279] _Organismus der Khetsua Sprache_, s. 64 (Leipzig, 1884). [280] See von Tschudi, _Organismus der Khetsua Sprache_, s. 65. It is to be regretted that in the face of the conclusive proof to the contrary, Dr. Middendorf repeats as correct the statement of Garcilasso de la Vega (_Ollanta, Einleitung_, s. 15, note). [281] See his Introduction to the _Travels of Pedro Cieza de Leon_, p. xxii. (London, 1864). [282] See his _Organismus der Khetsua Sprache_, ss. 64-66. [283] The Chinchaya dialect is preserved (insufficiently) by Father Juan de Figueredo in an Appendix to Torres-Rubio, _Arte de la Lengua Quichua_, edition of Lima, 1701. It retained the sounds of _g_ and _l_, not known in southern Kechua. The differences in the vocabularies of the two are apparent rather than real. Thus the Chin. _rupay_, sun, is the K. for sun’s heat (ardor del sol); Chin. _caclla_, face, is K. _cacclla_, cheeks. Markham is decidedly in error in saying that the Chinchaya dialect “differed very considerably from that of the Incas” (_Journal Royal Geog. Soc._, 1871, p. 316). [284] Introduction to his translation of Cieza de Leon, p. xlvii, note. [285] Bollaert, _Antiquarian and Ethnological Researches_, p. 81.