The American Spirit in the Writings of Americans of Foreign Birth
General
The American Spirit in the Writings of Americans of Foreign Birth
American literature; Americanization; Noncitizens -- United States
The influence of this nation has been considerable already; it will be
much more so yet in ages to come; political ideas will be developed
here, and have a decided effect on the whole European race, and, for
aught I know, upon other races. But as the Grecian art has kindled the
sense of the beautiful with many nations, but never could be equalled
again (as a national affair), so it is possible that political notions,
developed here and received by other nations, will have a sound
influence only if in their new application they are modified to the
given circumstances; for it is not in the power of any man or nation to
create all those circumstances under the shade of which liberty reposes
here. Politics is civil architecture, and a poor architect indeed is
he who forgets three things in building: the place where the building
is to be raised, the materials with which he has to build, and the
object for which the structure is erected. If the materials are Jews
of Palestine, and if the object of the fabric be to keep the people as
separate from neighbors as possible, the architect would not obtain his
end by a constitution similar to that of one of our new States.
It was necessary for the Americans, in order to make them fit to solve
certain political problems, which, until their solution here, were
considered chimerical (take as an instance the keeping of this immense
country without a garrison), that they should descend from the English,
should begin as persecuted colonists severed from the mother country,
and yet loving it with all their heart and all their soul; to have a
continent, vast and fertile, and possessing those means of internal
communication which gave to Europe the great superiority over Asia and
Africa; to be at such a distance from Europe that she should appear
as a map; to be mostly Protestants, and to settle in colonies with
different charters, so that, when royal authority was put down, they
were as so many independent States, and yet to be all of one metal, so
that they never ceased morally to form one nation, nor to feel as such.
You may say, “Strange, that an abuse of liberty, as this apparent or
real party strife in election contests actually is, should lead you to
the assertion that no nation is fitter for a government of law.” Yet I
do repeat it. How would it be with other nations? It would be _after_
an election of this kind that the real trouble would only _begin_; we
see an instance in South America. Here, on the other hand, as soon as
the election is over, the contest is settled, and the citizen obeys
the law. “Keep to the right, as the law directs,” you will often find
on sign-boards on bridges in this country. It expresses the authority
which the law here possesses. I doubt very much whether the Romans,
noted for their obedience to the law, held it in higher respect than
the Americans.
CARL SCHURZ
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account