———What courses must I choose?
What not? What both would order you refuse.
How shall I hope to express myself to each man's humour and
[115]conceit, or to give satisfaction to all? Some understand too
little, some too much, qui similiter in legendos libros, atque in
salutandos homines irruunt, non cogitantes quales, sed quibus vestibus
induti sint, as [116]Austin observes, not regarding what, but who
write, [117]orexin habet auctores celebritas, not valuing the metal,
but stamp that is upon it, Cantharum aspiciunt, non quid in eo. If he
be not rich, in great place, polite and brave, a great doctor, or full
fraught with grand titles, though never so well qualified, he is a
dunce; but, as [118]Baronius hath it of Cardinal Caraffa's works, he is
a mere hog that rejects any man for his poverty. Some are too partial,
as friends to overween, others come with a prejudice to carp, vilify,
detract, and scoff; (qui de me forsan, quicquid est, omni contemptu
contemptius judicant) some as bees for honey, some as spiders to gather
poison. What shall I do in this case? As a Dutch host, if you come to
an inn in. Germany, and dislike your fare, diet, lodging, &c., replies
in a surly tone, [119]aliud tibi quaeras diversorium, if you like not
this, get you to another inn: I resolve, if you like not my writing, go
read something else. I do not much esteem thy censure, take thy course,
it is not as thou wilt, nor as I will, but when we have both done, that
of [120]Plinius Secundus to Trajan will prove true, Every man's witty
labour takes not, except the matter, subject, occasion, and some
commending favourite happen to it. If I be taxed, exploded by thee and
some such, I shall haply be approved and commended by others, and so
have been (Expertus loquor), and may truly say with [121]Jovius in like
case, (absit verbo jactantia) heroum quorundam, pontificum, et virorum
nobilium familiaritatem et amicitiam, gratasque gratias, et multorum
[122] bene laudatorum laudes sum inde promeritus, as I have been
honoured by some worthy men, so have I been vilified by others, and
shall be. At the first publishing of this book, (which [123]Probus of
Persius satires), editum librum continuo mirari homines, atque avide
deripere caeperunt, I may in some sort apply to this my work. The
first, second, and third edition were suddenly gone, eagerly read, and,
as I have said, not so much approved by some, as scornfully rejected by
others. But it was Democritus his fortune, Idem admirationi et
[124]irrisioni habitus. 'Twas Seneca's fate, that superintendent of
wit, learning, judgment, [125]ad stuporem doctus, the best of Greek and
Latin writers, in Plutarch's opinion; that renowned corrector of vice,
as, [126]Fabius terms him, and painful omniscious philosopher, that
writ so excellently and admirably well, could not please all parties,
or escape censure. How is he vilified by [127] Caligula, Agellius,
Fabius, and Lipsius himself, his chief propugner? In eo pleraque
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account