The Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain and Ireland.Evans, John
History
The Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain and Ireland.
Evans, John
Bronze age -- Great Britain; Bronze age -- Ireland; Great Britain -- Antiquities
As Dr. Thurnam has pointed out, the ornamentation on a thin piece of
metal (said to have been gilt), which apparently decorated the hilt of
a bronze dagger, found in a barrow in Dorsetshire,[853] is of the same
character, though produced in a different manner. This dagger is said
by Douglas to have been “incisted” into wood. It is uncertain whether
this refers to the hilt or to the sheath; but in several instances
remains of sheaths have been found upon the blades of daggers, some
of which have been already adduced, and others will hereafter be
mentioned. Sir R. Colt Hoare, in a barrow near Amesbury,[854] found
an interment of burnt bones, and with it a bronze dagger which had
been “secured by a sheath of wood lined with linen cloth.” A small
lance-head, a pair of ivory nippers, and an ivory pin accompanied the
interment. In one instance the wood of the sheath was “apparently
willow.”[855]
I am unable to guarantee the accuracy of the representation of a
large dagger with its handle given in Fig. 290, the original having
unfortunately been destroyed in a fire. I have, however, copied it
from Dr. Thurnam’s[856] engraving, which was taken from a drawing by
the late Mr. S. Solly, F.S.A.[857] It was found in 1845, in a barrow
on Roke Down, near Blandford, Dorsetshire, and is thus described by
Mr. Shipp:[858] “The blade is exquisitely finished, and the handle,
which is ivory, as perfect and as highly polished as any of more
recent date. It was found with two small bronze spear-heads at the
bottom of a cist cut in the chalk, and covered with burnt bones
and ashes; and over it was an inverted urn of the coarsest make,
unburnt and unornamented.” In Mr. Shipp’s drawing the handle expands
gradually to the base like the mouth of a trumpet. In a subsequent
communication[859] Mr. Shipp describes the two spear-heads as of iron.
Mr. Solly[860] says that with it was a second small blade, also of
bronze, which may have been a knife, and makes no mention of iron
spear-heads. He also says that it lay beneath a stone more than
a ton in weight. Mr. C. Warne, F.S.A., has informed me that the
spear-heads—if, indeed, such they were—were of bronze and not of
iron. He has engraved the dagger in his Plate X.,[861] not from the
original, but from the figure in the _Journal of the Archæological
Association_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account