The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueductsParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueducts
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
In another place, Frontinus says[48] that several streams of water, and
first the Marcia, were carried to the Aventine from the _specus_ (_a
spe-cu_), that is from the old _specus_ he had before mentioned on the
Cœlian, and obviously from the west end of the Cœlian. The Temple of Spes
of Canina and others at the Porta Maggiore, is at least a mile from the
Aventine. The only way of giving an intelligible meaning of the passage
is that the author refers to the old _specus_ he had before mentioned, as
leading along the Cœlian to the Porta Capena. In the excavations made in
1868 and 1869, on the line of the wall of Servius Tullius from the Cœlian
to the Aventine, the conduits of three _specus_ were found, two of which
must have passed over the arch of the Porta Capena, in order to cross the
Via Appia, there a deep foss-way. Two conduits were seen in each of the
pits that were dug at intervals along the line, and at the junction with
the Piscina Publica under the Aventine they were all three perfect; the
lowest one is there cut in the tufa rock under the wall, the other two
are on the wall, and partly cut out of it.
Piranesi has preserved a sketch of the _specus_ of the aqueduct, which he
supposed to be the Anio Vetus upon its substructure; but he gives no clue
as to the exact spot whence that sketch was taken[49]. In its character
the masonry is very similar to that of the Marcian, but there are minor
differences sufficient to shew that it belongs to an earlier age.
Those who have paid attention to the manner in which ancient books have
been transmitted to modern times before the invention of printing,
and who are familiar with the use of records and of other medieval
manuscripts or transcripts, well know how full of abbreviations they
are, and how difficult it often is for the editor to fill up these
abbreviations, if he does not happen to know the word intended. The name
of _specus_ for the conduit of an aqueduct was essentially a technical
word. The first transcribers of the text of Frontinus were not Romans,
and did not know the term: hence they filled up the abbreviation _spē_,
or perhaps originally _spc̄_, with _spem_ or _spei_, instead of _specum_
or _specûs_. The same thing may have occurred in the text of Lampridius
(as mentioned in a note on a preceding page).
The Abbot of the monastery on Monte Cassino (now a public school and
public library) has kindly given me tracings of all the passages in
that manuscript in which this abbreviation occurs, and I have had them
reproduced by photography and phototype on the page annexed. Opposite
to this the same passages are given in the Italic characters, and a few
words that are necessary to complete the sense in Roman characters. This
is followed by an English translation of these passages, and by some
extracts from Livy and other authors in explanation.
[Illustration: FACSIMILE FROM THE MANUSCRIPT AT MONTE CASSINO[50].]
FRONTINUS DE AQUÆDUCTIBUS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account