The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
All local authority is practically in the hands of the _Valis_,
provincial governors, who are sent from Constantinople to represent the
sovereign, and are accountable to him alone. The blind policy which was
inaugurated by the present Sultan of dismissing non-Moslems from every
branch of public service—post, telegraph, custom-house, internal
revenue, engineering, and the like—has already been carried out to a
large extent all over the empire, and especially in Armenia. The
frequent changes in Turkish officials keeps their business in a state of
“confusion worse confounded,” and incites them to improve their chance
to plunder while it lasts. Traces of the relatively large revenue, wrung
from the people, and spent in improvements of service to them, are very
hard to find.
THE INHABITANTS.
Probably about one half of the population of Turkish Armenia is
Mohammedan, composed of Turks and Kurds. The former are mostly found in
and near the large cities, such as Erzingan, Baibourt, Erzerum, and Van,
and the plains along the northern part. The Kurds live in their mountain
villages over the whole region. The term Kurdistan, which in this region
the Turkish Government is trying to substitute for the historical one
Armenia, has no political or geographical propriety except as indicating
the much larger area over which the Kurds are scattered. In this vague
sense it applies to a stretch of mountainous country about fifteen
hundred miles in length, starting between Erzingan and Malatiah, and
sweeping east and south over into Persia as far as Kermanshah.
[Illustration:
A KURD OF THE OLD TYPE.
]
The number of the Kurds is very uncertain. Neither Sultan nor Shah has
ever attempted a census of them; and as they are very indifferent
taxpayers, the revenue tables—wilfully distorted for political
purposes—are quite unreliable. From the estimates of British consular
officers there appear to be about one and a half million Turkish Kurds,
of whom about 600,000 are in the _vilayets_ of Erzroom, Van, and Bitlis,
and the rest in the _vilayets_ of Harpoot, Diarbekir, Mosul, and Bagdad.
This is a very liberal estimate. There are also supposed to be about
750,000 in Persia.[6]
The Kurds, whose natural instincts lead them to a pastoral and predatory
life, are sedentary or nomad according to local and climatic
circumstances. Where exposed to a severe mountain winter they live
exclusively in villages, and in the case of Bitlis have even formed a
large part of the city population. But the tribes in the south, who have
access to the Mesopotamian plains, prefer a migratory life, oscillating
with the season between the lowlands and the mountains. The sedentary
greatly outnumber the nomad Kurds, but the latter are more wealthy,
independent, and highly esteemed. There is, probably, little ethnic
distinction between the two classes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account