The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question — John Shaqi
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
6. The books in the government offices at the Kaimakamlik are often
incorrect through mistakes or dishonesty, and in consequence taxes are
paid on fictitious names or on persons who have been dead for years.”
“III. _Farming of taxes._
Taxes are often farmed out to the highest bidder, who usually is some
powerful Kurdish chief. Either in consequence of his power, or by means
of bribes, he is secure from interference on the part of the government.
He collects the amount due the government and then takes for himself as
much as he chooses, his own will or an exhausted threshing-floor being
the only limit to his rapacity.
While he is collector for these villages they are considered as
belonging to him. During the year his followers pay frequent visits to
the villages. They are ignorant and brutal, and on such visits, as also
when collecting taxes, they treat the villagers with the utmost
severity.”
“IV. All the above assessors and collectors—and they are many, a
different one for each kind of tax, personal, house and land, sheep,
tobacco, etc.—on their visits to the villages, take with them _a retinue
of servants and soldiers, who, with their horses, must be kept at the
expense of the village, thus entailing a very heavy additional burden
upon them_. Soldiers and servants sent to the villagers to make
collections, very naturally take something for themselves.”
All the preceding testimony refers to regions where Jacobite and
Nestorian Christians predominate and thus prove that Armenians are by no
means the only sufferers.
The same state of affairs was found by Mrs. Bishop, who made
investigations on the ground five years ago.
“On the whole, the same condition of alarm prevails among the Armenians
as I witnessed previously among the Syrian[10] _rayahs_. It is more than
alarm, it is _abject terror_, and not without good reason. In plain
English, general lawlessness prevails over much of this region. Caravans
are stopped and robbed, travelling is, for Armenians, absolutely unsafe,
sheep and cattle are being driven off, and outrages, which it would be
inexpedient to narrate, are being perpetrated. Nearly all the villages
have been reduced to extreme poverty, while at the same time they are
squeezed for the taxes which the Kurds have left them without the means
of paying.
The repressive measures which have everywhere followed ‘the Erzerum
troubles’ of last June [1890]—the seizure of arms, the unchecked ravages
of the Kurds, the threats of the Kurdish Beys, who are boldly claiming
the sanction of the government for their outrages, the insecurity of the
women, and a dread of yet worse to come—have reduced these peasants to a
pitiable state.”[11]
Through the influence of the British Ambassador at Constantinople Mrs.
Bishop was allowed to state the situation to the Grand Vizier in person,
and on arriving in England she presented a detailed statement of facts
to the Foreign Office and also to a Parliamentary Committee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account