The armourer and his craft from the XIth to the XVIth centuryFfoulkes, Charles John
History
The armourer and his craft from the XIth to the XVIth century
Ffoulkes, Charles John
Armor -- History; Armorers; Weapons -- History
In the Wardrobe Expenses of Bolingbroke, Earl of Derby (Camden
Soc.), 1393, are found the following entries:--
fol. 32. pro j cofre ... ad imponendum scuta domini. xvij scot.
fol. 33. pro j house[100] pro scuto domini ix scot. xij d.
fol. 40. pro i breastplate domini purgando ibidem iij li. vij s.
The “buckler of steel painted” mentioned above is scheduled as
being in “a case of leather.” In an engraving of Charles I by W.
Hole, in the British Museum, a box is shown for holding the breast
and back plates.[101]
FOOTNOTES:
[93] Charles ffoulkes, “Italian Armour at Chalcis,” _Archæologia_,
LXII.
[94] Protect.
[95] _Arch. Journ._, LX, 106.
[96] Vol. IV, c. 114. This detail is not given either in Johnes’ or
Lord Berners’ translation.
[97] _Rebellion_, VII, 104.
[98] _Archæologia_, LI.
[99] _Cromwell’s Army_, Firth, 413.
[100] Cover.
[101] _Arch. Journ_., LX.
THE USE OF FABRICS AND LINEN
An important variety of defensive armour, which has not hitherto
received the notice which it deserves, is the padded and quilted
armour of linen, which was always popular with the foot-soldier on
account of its cheapness, and was in the thirteenth century held in
high esteem by the wealthier knight. In the case of crushing blows
it would of course protect the body from breaking of the skin,
but would not be of such use as the more rigid defence of plate.
It was, however, very effectual against cutting blows, and had
the advantage of being more easily put on and off, and, although
hot, was less oppressive than metal in long marches. In miniatures
of the fourteenth century we frequently find parts of the armour
coloured in such a way as to suggest that it is either not metal
or else metal covered with fabric. Where there was no metal and
where the wearer depended entirely on the fabric for protection it
was heavily quilted and padded, or else several thicknesses of the
material were used (Fig. 40). Where metal was used the defence was
the ordinary plate armour covered with fabric, or the metal was
inserted in small plates as is the case in the brigandine.
[Illustration: FIG. 40. Pourpointed cuisses from the brass of Sir
John de Argentine, Horseheath, Cambs, 1360.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account