The art of music, Vol. 05 (of 14) : $b The voice and vocal music
History
The art of music, Vol. 05 (of 14) : $b The voice and vocal music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
We should be on our guard, then, against assuming that what we know
as ‘song literature’--the songs written by composers in their study
and printed on paper before being sung--is any very considerable
part of the song music of the world. It is merely the music chiefly
at the disposal of highly educated people--principally because it is
_printed_. And from a certain standpoint--that of the school-trained
musician--it is perhaps the ‘greatest’ vocal music. But remember that
the standpoint of the school-trained musician is only one standpoint.
The conscious composer has chosen to look at his musical materials in
a certain way and to judge the result accordingly. But by another test
his work is inferior; in its power to move thousands of human hearts no
song by Schubert or Schumann or Brahms can begin to equal ‘Auld Lang
Syne’ or ‘The Marseillaise.’ Of necessity this book will be chiefly
concerned with consciously composed ‘art’ music. But we should always
remember that this is only because art music represents the great
majority of all the music that has been noted down--and of course in
a measure art songs at their best contain in a sublimated form the
elements of folk-song.
The less civilized and conscious people are, the more readily they do
their own singing. There is little spontaneous song among us to-day
and yet we can occasionally hear a workman humming an aimless tune
under his breath. This was probably the normal state of things when
men were less educated. Everybody was a composer, partly because it
was easier to make up your own song than to remember somebody else’s.
Among the Indians songs were regarded in some tribes as the personal
property of the person who invented them and were not to be sung by
any one else unless that second person had acquired the rights in it
by gift or inheritance. But generally, as people became somewhat more
advanced, songs were freely appropriated from one singer to another.
And each singer who borrowed generally added something of his own
to the song--something to express his sense of beauty or artistic
fitness: a more effective phrasing here, or a simpler group of notes
there. Sometimes the song was so popular that it passed from tribe to
tribe, or from nation to nation. In this case each people gave its
individuality to the song, adding perhaps a little ornamentation if
its nature was gay and volatile, or making the melody more regular and
balanced if its soul was earnest and contemplative. Everywhere the
races, the nations, and the tribes have shown their souls to us in
their songs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account