The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
In size these proscenia usually conformed to the rules of Vitruvius, and
were about ten feet deep, and from ten to twelve feet high. But sometimes
they were much lower than he directs. The proscenium at Oropus was only 8
ft. 2 in. in height, that at Priene only 8 ft. 8 in.[419] The proscenium
at Delos is given variously as 8 ft. 3 in. and 9 ft. 2 in.[420] On the
other hand, the stages at Athens and at the Peiraeeus were thirteen feet
above the level of the orchestra.[421] The wings by which the stage was
enclosed on each side sometimes projected a few feet beyond the front
line of the proscenium, as at Athens. Sometimes, as at Eretria, there
was no projection, and the front of the wings was continuous with that
of the stage. In many theatres, again, such as those of Megalopolis and
Sicyon, there were no permanent side-wings, and the stage was terminated
at each end by a mere wall.[422] In such cases it is probable that during
the dramatic performances temporary side-wings of wood were erected. The
theatres of Epidaurus, Oropus, Sicyon, and the later buildings at Eretria
exhibit a peculiar feature in the shape of certain ramps or sloping
passages visible to the audience and leading up from the parodos and the
outside of the stage-buildings to the door in the walls terminating the
ends of the stage. The position of those ramps is clearly shown in the
plan of the Epidaurian theatre (Fig. 6). It is possible that they were
used by the chorus for the purpose of descending from the first floor of
the stage-buildings to the entrance of the parodos. But probably they
served mainly for the entrance of actors who represented persons supposed
to be coming from a distance. The objection of Robert and Dörpfeld[423]
that the actor would have to come up the ramps and wait at the door of
the side-wings in view of the audience for his cue, before he could
enter—which they justly say would be a ridiculous sight—assumes what
it is quite unnecessary to assume, namely, that plays were performed
without practice or proper stage-management. Very little rehearsal would
be required in order that the actor’s arrival might be duly timed. A
different device for the entrance of such actors is found at Priene and
Assos. There are no side-wings, but the stage is rather longer than the
back-scene or the buildings of which the back-scene formed the face, and
is continued for some distance down each side of the buildings. The ends
of the stage are terminated by a wall containing no door. The idea seems
to have been that the persons supposed to come from a distance should
make their way down one of the passages on each side of the skene, and so
come round the corner of the stage. The theatres at Delos, Termessos, and
Ephesus seem to have employed variations of this device.[424]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account