The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
With the close of the fourth century the famous period of Athenian
tragedy came to an end. After this date the only tragic poets of any
celebrity were those who flourished at Alexandria. But though the genius
of the Attic poets was exhausted, there was no immediate cessation in
the production of new plays. The contests were still maintained. A long
series of inscriptions shows that, down even to the Christian era,
‘original tragedies’ continued to be the chief ornament of the City
Dionysia. The names of several Athenian tragic poets belonging to this
period have been preserved in theatrical records. One of them was a
descendant of Sophocles. As to the character of the contests, and the
proportion of old tragedies to new ones, nothing is known. After the
first century A.D. the composition of original tragic dramas for the
stage was finally discontinued in all parts of Greece, and must therefore
have been abandoned at the City Dionysia. But the festival itself still
continued to flourish; and the reproduction of old plays may have lasted,
there as elsewhere, for one or two centuries later.[68]
§ 5. _Comedy at the City Dionysia._
Very little is known about the early history of the comic contests at
the City Dionysia. The date of their first institution can only be
fixed approximately. Aristotle tells us that they were of later origin
than those in tragedy.[69] This being so, they cannot have reached back
further than about 500 B.C. On the other hand, there is an inscription
which proves that they were already in existence in 463.[70] Their
establishment must therefore be assigned to some period within the first
four decades of the century. The number of poets who were allowed to
compete differed at different epochs. In the fifth century it was always
three, as in tragedy.[71] But early in the fourth century it was raised
to five, both at the City Dionysia and at the Lenaea, and this continued
ever afterwards to be the regulation number.[72] The increase was
probably due, partly to the growing popularity of the comic drama, partly
also to the fact that, owing to the curtailment of the chorus, comedies
were now less expensive to produce, and took less time to perform. Each
poet competed with a single play. This was the invariable practice on the
comic stage, both at the City Dionysia and at the Lenaea. The exhibition
of groups of plays, after the manner of the tragic poets, was unknown
in the history of comedy. Still, in spite of this rule, an author was
sometimes enabled to bring out two plays at the same festival. But in
order to do so he had to take the place of two poets, and to compete
as it were against himself. The number of comedies remained the same.
Thus in 422 Aristophanes made a double appearance, and was first with
the Prelude, and second with the Wasps. Leucon, his sole antagonist,
was third with the Ambassadors.[73] In 288 Diodorus was second with
the Corpse, and third with the Madman.[74] Such cases, however, were
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account