The Audiencia in the Spanish Colonies: As illustrated by the Audiencia of Manila (1583-1800)Cunningham, Charles Henry
History
The Audiencia in the Spanish Colonies: As illustrated by the Audiencia of Manila (1583-1800)
Cunningham, Charles Henry
Philippines -- History -- 1521-1812; Spain -- Colonies -- Administration
I beg your Majesty that while it shall last (the war) you may
be pleased to discontinue the Audiencia here, as it is this that
most hinders and opposes the administration and the government,
... This is the enemy which most afflicts this commonwealth, and
most causes dissensions, parties, factions, and hatred between
the citizens--each auditor persecuting those citizens who are not
wholly of his own faction, especially those who extend aid and
good-will toward the governor, against whom, as it seems, they
show themselves always in league. They always make declarations
of grievances [against him] because they are not each one given,
as used to be and is the custom here, whatever they may ask
for their sons, relatives and servants; and they habitually
discredit the governor by launching through secret channels false
and malicious reports, and afterward securing witnesses of their
publicity. They even, as I have written to your Majesty, manage to
have religious and preachers publish these reports to which end,
and for his own security, each one of the auditors has formed an
alliance with the religious order which receives him best. [574]
He summarized as follows:
I consider this government much more difficult, with the auditors
of this Audiencia, than it is or would be even if there were more
war, for that war which they cause within its boundaries appears
beyond remedy, on account of their abilities and rank. [575]
An abundance of evidence exists on both sides of this controversy;
letters of complaint against the governor and charges against the
oidores by the governor. The vividness and apparent directness of
the charges and the apparent sincerity of both the governor and the
oidores make it extremely difficult, and, in fact, quite impossible
to decide on the basis of the evidence presented, who was right or
wrong, which charges, true or untrue, and who was really responsible
for the difficulties. It would appear that the king was prone to
sympathize with the governor rather than with the audiencia, for in
practically all cases the decision of the sovereign was adverse to
the tribunal. The fact that the governor was the royal representative
was probably a large factor in securing him the support of the home
government. Yet, on the other hand, the audiencia was in the same
sense the royal tribunal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account