The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
During the last quarter of the sixth and the first of the seventh
century the various branches of the Bulgar nation, stretching from the
Volga to the Danube, were consolidated and kept in control by their
prince Kubrat, who eventually fought on behalf of the Greeks against
the Avars, and was actually baptized in Constantinople. The power of
the Bulgars grew as that of the Avars declined, but at the death of
Kubrat, in 638, his realm was divided amongst his sons. One of these
established himself in Pannonia, where he joined forces with what was
left of the Avars, and there the Bulgars maintained themselves till
they were obliterated by the irruption of the Magyars in 893. Another
son, Asparukh, or Isperikh, settled in Bessarabia, between the rivers
Prut and Dniester, in 640, and some years later passed southwards.
After desultory warfare with Constantinople, from 660 onwards, his
successor finally overcame the Greeks, who were at that time at war
with the Arabs, captured Varna, and definitely established himself
between the Danube and the Balkan range in the year 679. From that year
the Danube ceased to be the frontier of the eastern empire.
The numbers of the Bulgars who settled south of the Danube are not
known, but what happened to them is notorious. The well-known process,
by which the Franks in Gaul were absorbed by the far more numerous
indigenous population which they had conquered, was repeated, and the
Bulgars became fused with the Slavs. So complete was the fusion, and so
preponderating the influence of the subject nationality, that beyond a
few personal names no traces of the language of the Bulgars have
survived. Modern Bulgarian, except for the Turkish words introduced
into it later during the Ottoman rule, is purely Slavonic. Not so the
Bulgarian nationality; as is so often the case with mongrel products,
this race, compared with the Serbs, who are purely Slav, has shown
considerably greater virility, cohesion, and driving-power, though it
must be conceded that its problems have been infinitely simpler.
5
_The Early Years of Bulgaria and the Introduction of Christianity_,
700–893
From the time of their establishment in the country to which they have
given their name the Bulgars became a thorn in the side of the Greeks,
and ever since both peoples have looked on one another as natural and
hereditary enemies. The Bulgars, like all the barbarians who had
preceded them, were fascinated by the honey-pot of Constantinople, and,
though they never succeeded in taking it, they never grew tired of
making the attempt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account