The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—TurkeyHogarth, D. G. (David George)
History
The Balkans: A History of Bulgaria—Serbia—Greece—Rumania—Turkey
Hogarth, D. G. (David George)
Balkan Peninsula -- History; Eastern question (Balkan)
For two hundred years after the death of Asparukh, in 661, the Bulgars
were perpetually fighting either against the Greeks or else amongst
themselves. At times a diversion was caused by the Bulgars taking the
part of the Greeks, as in 718, when they ‘delivered’ Constantinople, at
the invocation of the Emperor Leo, from the Arabs, who were besieging
it. From about this time the Bulgarian monarchy, which had been
hereditary, became elective, and the anarchy of the many, which the
Bulgars found when they arrived, and which their first few autocratic
rulers had been able to control, was replaced by an anarchy of the few.
Prince succeeded prince, war followed war, at the will of the feudal
nobles. This internal strife was naturally profitable to the Greeks,
who lavishly subsidized the rival factions.
At the end of the eighth century the Bulgars south of the Danube joined
forces with those to the north in the efforts of the latter against the
Avars, who, beaten by Charlemagne, were again pressing south-eastwards
towards the Danube. In this the Bulgars were completely successful
under the leadership of one Krum, whom, in the elation of victory, they
promptly elected to the throne. Krum was a far more capable ruler than
they had bargained for, and he not only united all the Bulgars north
and south of the Danube into one dominion, but also forcibly repressed
the whims of the nobles and re-established the autocracy and the
hereditary monarchy. Having finished with his enemies in the north, he
turned his attention to the Greeks, with no less success. In 809 he
captured from them the important city of Sofia (the Roman Sardica,
known to the Slavs as Sredets), which is to-day the capital of
Bulgaria. The loss of this city was a blow to the Greeks, because it
was a great centre of commerce and also the point at which the
commercial and strategic highways of the peninsula met and crossed. The
Emperor Nikiphóros, who wished to take his revenge and recover his lost
property, was totally defeated by the Bulgars and lost his life in the
Balkan passes in 811. After further victories, at Mesembria (the modern
Misivria) in 812 and Adrianople in 813, Krum appeared before the
capital, where he nearly lost his life in an ambush while negotiating
for peace. During preparations for a final assault on Constantinople he
died suddenly in 815. Though Krum cannot be said to have introduced
civilisation into Bulgaria, he at any rate increased its power and gave
it some of the more essential organs of government. He framed a code of
laws remarkable for their rigour, which was undoubtedly necessary in
such a community and beneficial in its effect. He repressed civil
strife, and by this means made possible the reawakening of commerce and
agriculture. His successor, of uncertain identity, founded in 822 the
city of Preslav (known to the Russians as Pereyaslav), situated in
eastern Bulgaria, between Varna and Silistria, which was the capital
until 972.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account