The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it — John Shaqi
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to itBoyle, John, active 1867
History
The battle-fields of Ireland, from 1688 to 1691 : $b including Limerick and Athlone, Aughrim and the Boyne. Being an outline history of the Jacobite war in Ireland, and the causes which led to it
Boyle, John, active 1867
Ireland -- History -- War of 1689-1691
he was surrounded were irreconcilable to his views; that a time-server
might wield and direct them if he pandered to their passions; but a
king could not rule in peace, and retain the faith _he_ had chosen.
Yet, with all the evidence of the three last reigns before him to the
contrary, he had an abiding faith in the justice of the English people.
He knew that he was the choice of the Irish, and believed the native
pride of the Scotch would not admit of the alienation of their crown;
but above all, he trusted in the justice of his views, and he came to
the throne with a fixed resolve to harmonize the conflicting elements
of the State, and to make England, what he believed it ought to have
been--a really free and happy nation.
CHAPTER II.
THE REIGN OF JAMES II. IN ENGLAND.--THE INVASION OF WILLIAM, PRINCE OF
ORANGE.--FROM 1685-1688.
The accession of James was not met by any overt act of opposition.
On the contrary, it was hailed by the rejoicings of the people, and
the parliamentary leaders of the High Church party, at that moment
plotting his expulsion, received him with the usual congratulations
and addresses of loyalty. The Catholics of England and Scotland, who
were still a respectable minority, felt their long-suppressed hopes
kindle anew, and by their Irish brethren the event was hailed with
undisguised satisfaction. Nothing could shake the loyalty of this
oppressed people to the house of Stuart. The cruel exactions, broken
pledges, and studied persecutions of the last three reigns were at
once forgotten. The advent of each false king after the other, had
been represented as sure to redress the grievances which the former
one had inflicted, and after every outrage they became more steadfast
in their devotion. If, during the rebellion of 1641, their attachment
to this house was sufficient to withdraw a large portion of them from
the standard of their native chiefs, then battling for their lands
and religious liberty, how then must they have felt when the house of
Stuart presented them a Catholic king, and one who gave unmistakable
signs that justice and toleration should at last be extended to them;
that persecution for conscience sake was at an end, and that the exiled
of many years might again return to their native land!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account