The Battle of Tsu-shima: between the Japanese and Russian fleets, fought on 27th May 1905Semenov, V. I. (Vladimir Ivanovich)
History
The Battle of Tsu-shima: between the Japanese and Russian fleets, fought on 27th May 1905
Semenov, V. I. (Vladimir Ivanovich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905 -- Naval operations; Tsushima, Battle of, 1905
Produced by Brian Coe, Charlie Howard, and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)
THE BATTLE OF TSU-SHIMA
FIRST EDITION _December 1906_
_Reprinted_ _February 1907_
_Reprinted_ _March 1907_
_Reprinted_ _July 1908_
_Reprinted_ _October 1909_
_Reprinted_ _September 1910_
_Reprinted_ _January 1912_
THE BATTLE OF
TSU-SHIMA
BETWEEN THE JAPANESE AND RUSSIAN
FLEETS, FOUGHT ON 27TH MAY 1905
BY CAPTAIN VLADIMIR SEMENOFF
(ONE OF THE SURVIVORS)
TRANSLATED BY
CAPTAIN A. B. LINDSAY
2ND KING EDWARD’S OWN GURKHA RIFLES
WITH A PREFACE BY
SIR GEORGE SYDENHAM CLARKE
G.C.M.G., F.R.S.
NEW YORK
E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
1913
“Captain Semenoff’s little volume, which would well repay translation,
is a remarkably graphic and luminous account of Admiral Togo’s
great victory, compiled from notes taken by the author during the
engagement. His account is all the more interesting as he was also on
the _Cesarevitch_ when Admiral Vitoft made his unsuccessful attempt
to escape from Port Arthur on 10th August 1904.... Every word of this
little volume bears the impress of reality, and enables the reader to
form a vivid picture of the various phases of the battle. There is a
plan showing the positions of the contending fleets from 1.20 till 7
P.M.”
--_Times Literary Supplement_, 17th August 1906.
PREFACE
The paucity of war experience since the introduction of the
steam-driven armoured ship invests the battle of Tsu-shima with supreme
importance. Between Trafalgar and the 27th May 1905, there had been
only two fleet actions on a large scale--those of Lissa and of the
Yalu--and the first was fought before the wooden vessel had disappeared
and the rifled gun had become universal. The various minor engagements
which occurred during this long period were either destitute of
teaching, or failed to provide an adequate basis for conclusions
capable of serving as guides to a rational system of tactics or to a
scientific shipbuilding policy.
It has, therefore, followed, in this country especially, that the
evolution of the warship has been frequently capricious, indicating
the absence of any clear principles, and entailing an immense total
expenditure upon vessels unsuited to our national requirements, but
happily not forced to demonstrate their inutility.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account