The Birth of Civilization in the Near EastFrankfort, Henri
History
The Birth of Civilization in the Near East
Frankfort, Henri
Civilization, Ancient; Egypt -- Antiquities; Iraq -- Antiquities; Middle East -- Civilization -- To 622
[76]Brunton, _The Badarian Civilization_, 48. The assumption finds
strong support in the tradition that Menes, the first king of the
First Dynasty, reclaimed all the land from Wasta to Cairo before he
founded Memphis at the north end of the strip so reclaimed. Such an
enterprise presupposes some established skill in work of that
nature.
[77]For a criticism of the hypothetical construction of Egyptian
prehistory in terms of united Upper and Lower Egyptian kingdoms in
conflict with one another, see my _Kingship and the Gods_, Chapter
I, 349, n. 6; 350, n. 15; 351, n. 19.
[78]The head of the Persian Gulf was perhaps 125 miles to the north
of Basra; or this area may have been a lagoon, separated from the
Gulf by the “Bar of Basra.”
[79]The oldest of these is marked by various kinds of simple pottery
wares (Hassuna ware) decorated with incisions or merely burnished to
a high gloss. In addition there were sickles with flint “teeth” and
underground silos for grain storage. Sheep, goats, oxen, and asses
were kept. In a second stage appears fine painted pottery, called
Samarran—an offshoot of a ceramic tradition at home in Persia. It
was, in its turn, displaced by another type of pottery called Tell
Halaf, which is found from the Gulf of Alexandrette to the region
east of Mosul. The archaeological material is fully discussed in Ann
Louise Perkins, _The Comparative Archaeology of Early Mesopotamia_
(Chicago, 1949).
[80]See the article and photographs of Melvin Hall in _Asia_ (New
York), February 1939.
[81]This stage of their ceramics had been known from a small site
near Erech (A. Nöldeke and others, _Neunter Vorläufiger Bericht....
Uruk-Warka_, Berlin, 1938, Plates 36-40), when it was found well
represented at Abu Shahrein (Eridu): See _Illustrated London News_,
11 September 1948, p. 305; _Sumer_, IV (Baghdad, 1948), 115 ff.
There is nothing against calling this pottery “Eridu ware” as long
as its historical connections are not obscured. It is quite
gratuitous to claim that “Al Ubaid people” can no longer be called
the earliest settlers in southern Mesopotamia, for the Eridu ware is
simply an earlier stage of the Al Ubaid ware. If quibbles about
names are disregarded, it remains true that the earliest settlers of
the plain descended from Persia; the new ware shows an earlier stage
of their ceramics than has hitherto been found in the plain but it
was already known from the western edge of the Highland, _e.g._ Tepe
Khazineh near Susa (J. de Morgan, _Mémoires de la Délégation en
Perse_, Paris, 1908).
[82]C. Leonard Woolley in _Antiquaries Journal_, X (1930), 335.
[83]Fulanain, _The Marsh Arab, Haji Rikkan_ (Philadelphia, 1928),
21.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account