The Birth of Civilization in the Near EastFrankfort, Henri
History
The Birth of Civilization in the Near East
Frankfort, Henri
Civilization, Ancient; Egypt -- Antiquities; Iraq -- Antiquities; Middle East -- Civilization -- To 622
[84]Ancient Eridu. _Illustrated London News_, 31 May, 1947, 11
September, 1948; _Sumer_, III (Baghdad, 1947), 84 ff.; _Orientalia_,
XVII (Rome, 1948), 115-22. _Sumer_, IV (1948), 115 ff. shows the
development from a very small and primitive village shrine in the
earliest layer to a building recognizable in its main features as
the prototype of later temples.
[85]After T. Jacobsen in _Journal of Near Eastern Studies_, V
(1946), 140.
[86]We cannot say for certain whether its bearers were the Sumerians
who created the earliest civilization of Mesopotamia in the
subsequent—the Protoliterate—period. But no decisive proof for a
later arrival of the Sumerians has been offered, and the continuity
in cult and architecture support the view that they were the
dominant element in the Al Ubaid period, as they remained throughout
the third millennium in the south of the country. See also p. 51, n.
1 below.
[87]The earliest tablets, of the Protoliterate period, seem to be
written in Sumerian. They use the Sumerian sexagesimal system (with
units for 10, 60, 600, and 3600) and refer to Sumerian gods like
Enlil. But Sumerian has no clearly recognized affinity to other
tongues.
It is important to realize that the term “Sumerian,” strictly
speaking, can be used only for this language. There is no physical
type which can be called by that name. From Al Ubaid times until the
present day, the population of Mesopotamia has consisted of men
predominantly belonging to the Mediterranean or Brown race, with a
noticeable admixture of broad-headed mountaineers from the
north-east. This is, for instance, true of the Early Dynastic
period, as the skulls from Al Ubaid and Kish show. Skeletons of the
earliest known inhabitants of the plain, found at Eridu and Hassuna,
have been briefly discussed by C. S. Coon in _Sumer_, V (1949),
103-6; VI (1950), 93-6. They represent “rather heavy-boned
prognathous and large-toothed mediterraneans.” The much-discussed
problem of the origin of the Sumerians may well turn out to be the
chase of a chimera.
[88]A. J. Wilson in _Geographical Journal_, LIV (London, 1925), 235
ff.
[89]W. K. Loftus, _Travels and Researches in Chaldaea and Susiana_
(London, 1857), 7-8. On 17 May 1950 the correspondent of _The Times_
reported from Baghdad that “after a break in the Tigris bund ...
about 2000 mud houses have already collapsed.”
[90]“Tell Uqair,” by Seton Lloyd and Fuad Safar, in _Journal of Near
Eastern Studies_, II (1943), 131-58.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account