Apocryphal books (Old Testament); Enoch (Biblical figure); Ethiopic book of Enoch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Charles holds that though there is not unity of authorship there is,
none the less, uniformity; for, according to him, all the books were
written by _Chassidim_,[6] or by their successors, the Pharisees. This
contention has been strongly assailed and much weakened by Leszynsky in
a recent work on the Sadducees.[7] While frankly recognizing the
composite character of the book, Leszynsky holds that the original
portions of it[8] emanated from Sadducæan circles; and that the special
object of the book originally was the bringing about of a reform of the
calendar. He points to the ascription of the book to _Enoch_ as
supporting his contention, for Enoch lived 365 years,[9] _i. e._ his
years correspond to the number of days in the _solar_ year; the basis of
reckoning time was one of the fundamental points of difference between
the Pharisees and Sadducees, for whereas the former reckoned time by the
_lunar_ year (360 days), the latter did so by the _solar_ year. Here a
significant remark of Burkitt’s is worth recalling; in writing about the
false titles given to all the Apocalyptic books, he says: “There is
another aspect of pseudonymous authorship to which I venture to think
sufficient attention has not been given. It is this, that the names were
not chosen out of mere caprice; they indicated to a certain extent what
subjects would be treated and the point of view of the writer.”[10]
Further, the fact that “Enoch walked with God; and he was not; for God
took him,”[11] _i. e._ that he ascended into the heavens, is also
significant; for he would thereby be just the one to know all about the
heavenly luminaries; he was just the most appropriate author of a book
which was to deal with astronomical questions. “The Sadducæan character
of the original work,” says Leszynsky, “is seen most clearly in the
discussion regarding the calendar; chapters lxxii.—lxxxii. are rightly
called the Book of Astronomy:[12] ‘the book of the courses of the
luminaries of the heaven, the relations of each, according to their
classes, their dominion and their seasons, according to their names and
places of origin, and according to their months ... with regard to all
the years of the world and unto eternity, till the new creation is
accomplished which endureth till all eternity’ (lxxii. 1). That sounds
almost as though the author of the Book of Jubilees had written it. That
it is not a merely scientific interest which impels the writer to give
expression to his astronomical theories may be seen from the words at
the conclusion of the section: ‘Blessed are all the righteous, blessed
are all those who walk in the way of righteousness, and sin not as the
sinners in the reckoning of all their days, in which the sun traverseth
the heaven, entering into and departing from the portals for thirty
days...’ (lxxxii. 4-7). Herein one can discern quite clearly the
tendency of the writer. He desires the adoption of the solar year, while
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account