Apocryphal books (Old Testament); Enoch (Biblical figure); Ethiopic book of Enoch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
i.-v. The latest portion,
but pre-Christian.
Chapter cv, which consists of only two verses, cannot be dated; while
cviii. is in the nature of an appendix, probably added subsequently, to
the whole work.
While these dates may be regarded as approximately correct, it should be
pointed out that differences of opinion exist among scholars on the
subject. Schürer holds, for example, that, with the exception of
chapters xxxvii.-lxxi. (the “Parables,” or “Similitudes”), the entire
book belongs to the period 130-100 B.C.; the “Parables” he assigns to a
time not earlier than Herod the Great. Beer thinks that the
“Dream-Visions” (chapters lxxxiii.-xc.) belong to the time of John
Hyrcanus (135-105 B.C.), and he includes under the pre-Maccabæan
portions only xci. 12-17, xcii. xciii. 1-14; and holds that the rest of
the book was written before 64 B.C. Dalman maintains that it cannot be
proved that the important section xxxvii.-lxxi. (the “Similitudes”) is
“the product of the pre-Christian period,” though he fully recognizes
its Jewish character, Burkitt regards the writer as “almost
contemporary” with the philosopher Posidonius (135-51 B.C.). There is
thus some diversity of opinion as to the date of the book among leading
authorities. That it is, as a whole, pre-Christian, may be regarded as
definitely established. More difficult is the question whether any
portions of it are pre-Maccabæan; Charles gives various reasons for his
belief that considerable parts are pre-Maccabæan; we are inclined to
agree with him, though it may be questioned whether the last word on the
subject has been spoken.
Authorship
As the various parts of the book[4] clearly belong to different dates,
diversity of authorship is what one is naturally led to expect; and of
this there can, indeed, be no shadow of doubt. The author of the
earliest portions was a Jew who lived, as Burkitt has shown, in northern
Palestine, in the land of Dan, south-west of the Hermon range, near the
head-waters of the Jordan. This is important, as it tends to show that
the book, or books, is really Palestinian, and one which, therefore,
circulated among Jews in Palestine. “If, moreover, the author came from
the north, that helps to explain the influence the book had upon the
Religion that was cradled in Galilee.”[5] Of the authors of the other
three books of which “Enoch” is made up (viz. “The Dream-Visions,” “The
Book of the Heavenly Luminaries,” and “The Similitudes”) we know nothing
save what can be gathered from their writings as to their religious
standpoint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account