Is there any such natural and irremovable inferiority in human beings?
When we come to study the question we find it complicated by a different
phenomenon, that of racial immaturity, which we have to face frankly and
get clear in our minds. One of the most obvious facts of nature is that
of infancy and childhood. We have just pointed out that if you are
competing with a child, you do it in an entirely different way and under
an entirely different set of rules, and if you fail to do this, you are
unfair and even cruel to the child. And it is a fact of our world that
there are some races more backward in the scale of development than
other races. You may not like this fact, but it is silly to try to evade
it. People who live in savage huts and beat on tom-toms and fight with
bows and arrows and cannot count beyond a dozen--such people are not
the mental or moral equals of our highly civilized races, and to treat
them as equals, and compete with them on that basis, means simply to
exterminate them. And we should either exterminate them at once and be
done with it, or else make up our minds that they are in a childhood
stage of our race, and that we have to guide them and teach them as we
do our children.
There is no more useful person than the wise and kind teacher. But
suppose we saw some one pretending to be a teacher to our children,
while in reality enslaving and exploiting them, or secretly robbing and
corrupting them--what would we say about that kind of teacher? The name
of that teacher is capitalist commercialism, and his profession is known
as "the white man's burden"; his abuse of power is the cause of our
present racial wars and revolts of subject peoples. A fair-minded man,
desirous of facing all the facts of life, hardly knows what stand to
take in such a controversy; that is, hardly knows from which cause the
colored races suffer more--the white man's exploitation, or their own
native immaturity.
To say that certain races are in a childhood stage, and need instruction
and discipline, is an entirely different thing from saying they are
permanently inferior and incapable of self-government. Whether they are
permanently inferior is a problem for the man of science, to be
determined by psychological tests, continued possibly over more than one
generation. We have not as yet made a beginning; in fact, we have not
even acquired the scientific impartiality necessary to such an inquiry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account