The Book of the Bayeux Tapestry: Presenting the Complete Work in a Series of Colour FacsimilesBelloc, Hilaire
History
The Book of the Bayeux Tapestry: Presenting the Complete Work in a Series of Colour Facsimiles
Belloc, Hilaire
Bayeux tapestry
The bier of Edward the Confessor is designed in the twelfth century
fashion, not in the eleventh—the long vestment of the royal personages
throughout is a twelfth-century not an eleventh-century type. The
description of the coat of mail in Wace (verses 6522 and the
following) is that of the Tapestry; and most important of all the coat
of mail of the Tapestry is no longer the mere breastplate, but the
full coat of the Crusading period.
It is true that we have very little information upon the eleventh
century armour, but with the Crusades we do get a full description,
and we have a right to judge by what we know rather than by what we do
not know. Thus Ordericus Vitalis remarks the full coat as a novelty.
The helmet with a nasal is not now in any document before the seal of
Baldwin, the late 1115, but after that date it is common, as one may
see in the seal of Charles of Flanders or of Matthew of Montmorency.
Indeed, the seal of William the Conqueror himself gives no sign of the
nasal, and the same is true of the seals of the First Crusade. This
kind of helmet is wholly twelfth century; but remark that William, in
the Chronicles, lifted his helmet to show his face. So there is here
doubt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
_The corresponding reference-numbers will be found in the following
text._
Footnote 2:
Many of our historians carelessly talk of Harold being brought to
Rouen. We have no proof of this. There is just one allusion in the
Chronicles to the place where delivery of Harold’s body was made from
Guy to William, and the place mentioned is what we should expect, a
frontier town, Eu. The Palatium does not only mean a _place_, it also
means an _institution_; and though Rouen was William’s chief city,
whenever he moved, his clerks and staff of government—that is, his
“Palatium”—moved with him.
Footnote 3:
Mr. Oman in his version of the affair makes Bonneville the scene of
the oath. I have not seen the proof of this. The two fundamental
pieces of evidence—Wace and the Tapestry—both say Bayeux. William had
a castle above the river Touques at Bonneville, and ruins of it, or of
a later construction upon its site, can be seen to-day; but it is a
good two days’ march from Bayeux.
The French word “parliament” meant, of course, any general assembly
for discussion, and was here used of something earlier than any
representative assembly, though these were already springing up in the
Spanish March of the Pyrenees, to which district we owe the origin of
representative institutions.
Footnote 4:
I have never understood why this third messenger should have been
confused with Harold himself. The Latin inscription is quite clear:
“Here they gave to Harold the Crown of King.” The people holding the
axes are not Harold, neither is the man offering the crown, that I can
see.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account