The book of the child: An attempt to set down what is in the mind of childrenHow, F. D. (Frederick Douglas)
Science
The book of the child: An attempt to set down what is in the mind of children
How, F. D. (Frederick Douglas)
Child psychology
Here is an example. A short time ago a little boy still in the
nursery was taken out by his father in the carriage for a drive. When
they arrived at the farther end of the town the little chap was sent
home in the carriage by himself, his father having been deposited at
his place of business. When the carriage arrived back at the door of
the house the parlourmaid came out and carried the child indoors,
being surprised to find him in tears. Struggling out of her arms he
set off upstairs to the nursery, sobbing bitterly all the way. “What
is the matter, dear?” said the nurse. “I’se had to walk by mine own
self all froo the town, and I was dreffly frightened,” was the reply.
“How ever did you get across the High Street, my poor darling?”
“There was lots of cabs and cawwiages and things, and I knewed I
would be runned over!” All this with many sobs and much burying
of his head in nurse’s lap. Hearing the wailing in the nursery up
came the parlourmaid, to whom the nurse poured out her indignation.
“Just fancy! Making this poor lamb walk home all through the town
by himself! It’s a mercy he was not killed again and again!” “Walk
through the town! Why, whatever do you mean? Why, I lifted him out of
the carriage at this very door not ten minutes ago!”
Well, the temptation to punish the little fellow must have been
great. One hopes it was resisted. There can be small doubt that a
vivid imagination had mastered him as he drove home alone. It was
all “what might have been,” and it became so real to him that it
seemed to be “what was.”
[Sidenote: Confession of an Imaginary Sin.]
Again, a case recurs to the recollection of the writer where a small
child was summoned into the presence of an angry parent who listened
to no excuses, but insisted so strongly and so often on the guilt
of the small boy, that at last he actually seemed convinced by the
reiterated accusation and, imagining that his parent must know best,
actually confessed to a sin which subsequent events proved the
impossibility of his having committed.
Now for an example where it is probable that the imagination of the
child is used for ulterior purposes and the borderland between fancy
and untruthfulness is likely to be crossed.
[Sidenote: Jinks.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account