The book of the child: An attempt to set down what is in the mind of childrenHow, F. D. (Frederick Douglas)
Science
The book of the child: An attempt to set down what is in the mind of children
How, F. D. (Frederick Douglas)
Child psychology
At the same time there is every probability that infants observe and
think more accurately than would be generally allowed by their casual
male acquaintances. The present writer can vouch for at least one
case where a permanent impression was made upon the mind of a very
young child, and memory markings were indented which certainly lasted
for several years. The facts are these: A man who shall be called
A. B. was invalided and ordered to spend a winter at the seaside.
While there a young married couple with their first baby shared his
lodgings. The child, a boy, was just six months old, and for some
eighteen weeks he was the frequent companion of A. B., especially
when the weather prevented either from going out. During many an
hour the baby boy lay on the cushions of a low basket chair kicking
and crowing with delight while his man friend talked or sang to him,
and so a firm friendship grew up between the two, though its verbal
expression was entirely confined to the elder of them.
When the baby was ten months old the inevitable parting came, and for
about two years they saw nothing of one another. At last, however, it
became possible for the child’s mother to bring him to a house where
his old friend was staying. During the journey she said to the little
chap, “Do you know who you are going to see? You are going to see A.
B.” Without a moment’s hesitation the boy said, “A. B. with beard?”
showing that he remembered what was no doubt to him the most striking
item in his friend’s appearance, though at the time that the memory
mark was made on his mind he was too young to pronounce the word
describing the thing that made the impression. But further evidence
of the child’s memory was forthcoming, for as soon as he was set down
on arrival at the front door of the house he ran straight to A. B.
with every mark of affectionate joy at seeing him again.
Here is an instance of infant memory that is absolutely true, and, as
the boy was in no way precocious or unnatural, it is fair to assume
that there must be plenty of cases where the impressions made upon
an infant’s mind during the period when its age is marked by months
and not by years are of a far more permanent nature than is generally
assumed.
[Sidenote: Memory at a Later Age.]
But for most illustrations of children’s memory we are compelled to
begin at a later age. Few people remember much that happened before
they were three years old, but from about that time it is common to
find a remarkably clear recollection of certain scattered events or
experiences.
It is a usual thing to hear it said by those who have passed middle
age, that their remembrance of their childhood grows clearer as time
goes on. This is accounted for by the fact that _fewer_ impressions
were made upon their minds during their earliest years, whereas in
later life the memory tablets get crowded with all sorts and kinds of
markings which become confused and partially unintelligible in a very
short time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account