The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
sympathy; their religious interests were not so entirely absorbed
in their own view of things that they could not see and appreciate
the excellence of Greek thought and philosophy; their minds were
open to receive and to be influenced by what was good and true,
wherever it was to be found. The Dispersion Jew was a Jew at heart,
though not according to the Pharisaic standard, and convinced of
the pre-eminence of his own faith, but he was none the less ready
to render due justice to the opinions and convictions of his Greek
neighbours; the interesting evidence regarding this given in the
_Letter of Aristeas_[72] (121, 122) is worth quoting here: “Regarding
discussions and explanations of the Law they possessed great
aptitude. They struck just the right balance, for they discarded
the hard literalness of the letter, and were modest with regard to
their own wisdom, and were ready to hold argument, to listen to the
opinions of others, and to consider thoroughly every question that
might be raised.” This broad-mindedness was one of the results of
unfettered contact with the outer world. But a result, as remarkable
as it was important, followed; for in comparing his religion with the
various beliefs of the Gentiles, the Jew of the Dispersion became
convinced, in a way which hitherto had not been possible, that both
in faith and practice Judaism was, in so far as its fundamentals were
concerned, immeasurably purer and truer, in most respects, though
not in all, than anything that the Gentiles could offer. He felt,
therefore, that he had something to say and give to the world which
concerned all men. Hence arose those missionary efforts, so contrary
to the spirit of exclusiveness which characterized traditional
Judaism, but which were crowned with a considerable measure of
success. Yet a grave and subtle danger lurked here for the Jew of the
Dispersion; in his desire to make Judaism as attractive as possible
to the Gentiles, he presented it with such modifications that it
could no longer be called genuine Judaism. Under the influence of
the Hellenistic spirit the rigidity of the Law was smoothed down,
and some Jewish beliefs appeared in a somewhat modified form[73];
many converts did not do more than keep the dietary laws and observe
the Sabbath; and this was acquiesced in. The reaction of this upon
those who thus presented a form of Judaism which was to some extent
spurious, cannot well have been without its consequences, since
their action must necessarily have affected their own faith in their
religion and their ideas upon the importance of their religious
rites.[74]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account