The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contentsOesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Religion
The books of the Apocrypha : $b their origin, teaching and contents
Oesterley, W. O. E. (William Oscar Emil)
Bible. Apocrypha -- Introductions
The name of this Greek Version of the Bible owes its origin to the
legend contained in the so-called _Letter of Aristeas_, in which
an account is given of how Ptolemy II (Philadelphus)[78] desired
to have a Greek translation of the Hebrew Book of the Law (i.e.,
the Pentateuch), and sent to Eleazar, the high-priest in Jerusalem,
asking him to send competent scholars to Alexandria who would be
able to undertake the task of translation. The high-priest, the
account continues, readily responded to this request, and despatched
seventy-two learned Jews, each of the twelve tribes being represented
by six of them. Ptolemy received them with great honour on their
arrival in Alexandria, and entertained them hospitably during the
whole of their sojourn. The seventy-two went into retirement to the
island of Pharos, opposite Alexandria, where they laboured at the
translation. This took seventy-two days; the translation was then
delivered to the king, who thereupon ordered the books to be placed
in the royal library. The translators, after having been presented
with rich gifts, returned to Judæa. This is the legend to which the
name _Septuagint_ (“Seventy”) owes its origin, a name which has clung
to it in spite of its being now generally recognized that the _Letter
of Aristeas_ is unhistorical so far as this story is concerned. Who
the translators of the Hebrew Bible into Greek were is not known.
That the various parts of the Septuagint were not only translated by
different authors, but also belong to different ages, is certain.
It is quite probable that, so far as the Pentateuch is concerned,
the _Letter of Aristeas_ contains a true tradition in ascribing
its translation into Greek to about B.C. 280.[79] As to the rest
of the books, though the evidence is fragmentary, it may be safely
stated that most of them, if not all, were translated before the
beginning of the Christian era. Ryle has shown that there is evidence
for believing that Philo (about B.C. 20-A.D. 50) utilized all the
books of the Greek Old Testament, with the exception of Esther,
Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs and Daniel.[80]
This great product of Hellenistic influence upon the Jews is seen to
be all the more significant when it is realized that in the fifth
century B.C. the Aramaic language, as the recently found Elephantiné
_papyri_ show, was the language spoken by the Jews of Egypt; and not
only was this the ordinarily spoken language, but it was also that
in which literary works were written.[81] Yet in the course of not
much more than a century this was displaced by Greek; and even in
the synagogues Greek was the language used. For some time, no doubt,
though apparently not for very long, the Hebrew Scriptures were
translated by word of mouth into Aramaic in the synagogues of the
Dispersion; but when this language fell into disuse Greek had to be
used; and ultimately it was found necessary to have the Scriptures
themselves in Greek.[82]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account