The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day — John Shaqi
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
The small portholes of the Spanish ships, which permitted neither of
training, nor elevation, nor depression, are not altogether to be put
down to stupidity or neglect of progress, for all that they were mainly
the result of ultra-conservatism. The gun--as Professor Laughton has
made clear--was regarded in Spain as a somewhat dishonourable weapon.
Ideals of “cold steel” held the field. Portholes were kept very small,
so that enemies relying on musketry should not be able to get the
advantage that large portholes might supply. To close with the enemy
and carry by boarding was the be-all and end-all of Spanish ideas
of naval warfare. When able to employ their own tactics they were
formidable opponents, though to the English tactics merely so many
helpless haystacks.
On shore, in England, the coming of the Armada provoked a good deal of
panic; though the army which Elizabeth raised and reviewed at Tilbury
was probably got together more with a view to allaying this panic than
from any expectations that it would be actually required. The views of
the British seamen on the matter were entirely summed up in Drake’s
famous jest on Plymouth Hoe, that there was plenty of time to finish
the game of bowls and settle the Spaniards afterwards!
[Illustration: THE SPANISH ARMADA--1588.]
Yet this very confidence might have led to the undoing of the English.
The researches of Professor Laughton have made it abundantly clear that
had Medina Sidonia followed the majority opinion of a council of
war held off the Lizard, he could and would have attacked the English
fleet in Plymouth Sound with every prospect of destroying it, because
there, and there only, did opportunity offer them that prospect of a
close action upon which their sole chance of success depended. Admiral
Colomb has elaborated the point still further, with a quotation from
Monson to the effect that had the Armada had a pilot able to recognise
the Lizard, which the Spaniards mistook for Ramehead, they might have
surprised the English fleet at Plymouth. This incident covers the whole
of what Providence or luck really did for England against the Spanish.
To a certain extent a parallel of our own day exists. When
Rodjestvensky with the Baltic fleet reached Far Eastern waters, there
came a day when his cruisers discovered the entire Japanese fleet
lying in Formosan waters. The Russian admiral ignored them and went
on towards Vladivostok. The parallel ends here because the “Japanese
fleet” was merely a collection of dummies intended to mislead him.[9]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account