The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day — John Shaqi
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
It is by no means to be supposed that the Armada in its conception was
the foolhardy enterprise that on the face of things it looks to have
been. The idea of it was first mooted by the Duke of Alva so long ago
as 1569. In 1583 it became a settled project in the able hands of the
Marquis of Santa Cruz, who alone among the Spaniards was not more or
less afraid of the English. In the battle of Tercera in 1583, certain
ships, which if not English were at any rate supposed to be, had shown
the white feather. Santa Cruz assumed therefrom that the English were
easily to be overwhelmed by a sufficiently superior force, and he
designed a scheme whereby he would use 556 ships and an army of 94,222
men.
Philip of Spain had other ideas. Having a large army under the Duke
of Parma in the Netherlands, he proposed that this force should be
transported thence to England in flat-bottomed boats, while Santa Cruz
should take with him merely enough ships to hold the Channel, and
prevent any interference by the English ships with the invasion.
Before the delayed Armada could sail Santa Cruz died; and despite his
own protestations Medina Sidonia was appointed in Santa Cruz’s place
to carry out an expedition in which he had little faith or confidence.
His total force at the outset consisted of 130 ships and 30,493 men. Of
these ships not more than sixty-two at the outside were warships, and
some of these did not carry more than half-a-dozen guns.
The main English fighting force consisted of forty-nine warships, some
of which were little inferior to the Spanish in tonnage, though all
were much smaller to the eye, as they were built with a lower freeboard
and without the vast superstructures with which the Spaniards were
encumbered. As auxiliaries, the English had a very considerable force
of small ships; also the Dutch fleet in alliance with them.
The guns of the English ships were, generally speaking, heavier,
all their gunners were well trained, and their portholes especially
designed to give a considerable arc of fire, whereas the Spanish had
very indifferent gunners and narrow portholes. The Spaniards themselves
thoroughly recognised their inferiority in the matter of gunnery,
and the specific instructions of their admiral were that he was to
negative this inferiority by engaging at close quarters, and trust to
destroying the enemy by small-arm fire from his lofty superstructures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account