The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day — John Shaqi
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
| 14in.-12in. | 18in.-6in.*
| | | |
Armament | 4--12in., 6--6in., | 4--13.5, 6--6in., | 4--13.5, 6--6in., | 2--16.25, 10--6in.,
| and smaller, | and smaller, | and smaller, | and smaller,
| 2 sub. and 4 | as _Collingwood_ | as _Collingwood_ | as _Collingwood_
| above water tubes | | |
=====================+====================+=====================+=====================+====================
As compared with the _Colossus_ and _Edinburgh_ class of the same date
and era of design, the “Admirals” were somewhat inferior in armour
protection, but because of that secured a far better speed and a
greatly superior big gun command.
In all the “Admiral” class the armour weighed about 2,500 tons--say,
20 per cent. of the displacement. This proportion has never been very
greatly varied from either before or since, and the popular idea that
Barnaby designs sacrificed armour weight for other features is entirely
incorrect. The real Barnaby ideal is better described (the conditions
of his own time being kept in mind) as an attempt to put into practice
“everything or nothing,” so far as protection was concerned. To-day,
a compromise is in fashion, and Barnaby is very much out of date.
It may well be but a phase in the cycle of naval design. Properly
to appreciate the _Admiral_ class ideal, we have to translate it
into the ideal which obtains to-day. Thus put, the _Admirals_ would
be somewhat swifter than our existing battle-cruisers, their vitals
would be invulnerable and their armaments superior to that of any
potential enemy. They would not, in fact, very greatly differ from
Admiral Bacon’s conception (published some five years before the
present war) of the battleship of the future, in which he predicted the
disappearance of much of the side armour of to-day.
[Illustration:
_Photo_] [_Symonds & Co._
THE _BENBOW_--A SHIP OF THE “ADMIRAL” CLASS.]
The coming of the medium calibre quick-firer soon rendered the
“Admirals” obsolete and even ridiculous. The medium calibre quick-firer
profoundly modified design until the development of the big gun
enabled it to act well beyond the effective range of the medium gun,
and incidentally enabled it to fire nearly as fast as the elementary
quick-firers were built to do. Thus we have come back to something very
akin to the condition under which the Barnaby ships were designed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account