The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day — John Shaqi
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
These ships could not, perhaps, be described as an absolutely original
idea, save in so far as the British Navy was concerned, since the
Italian _Italia_ was launched in the same year that the _Collingwood_,
the first of the “Admirals” was laid down. The _Italia_, equally
abnormally fast (or faster) for the period, carried four 100-ton guns
échelonned in one large heavily armoured barbette amidships, but had
no water-line belt whatever, and relied entirely upon an armour-deck
to protect the motive power. In the “Admirals” the motive power was
thoroughly protected by the vertical belt amidships, while flotation
otherwise depended upon internal sub-divisions.
The “Admiral” class idea was re-developed into armoured cruisers in
a somewhat curious fashion. At that time the French Navy was second
in the world, and French ideas of construction commanded a great deal
of respect. French notions at that era ran largely to single gun
positions, four guns being separately disposed in four barbettes placed
one ahead, one astern, and one on either side. The particular point of
this arrangement was that while British designs accepted two or four
big guns bearing, the French system allowed for a definite mean of
three. More practically put, this may be translated into a conception
that an enemy would use every effort to avoid positions in which four
big guns could be brought to bear on him, and seek those in which he
was exposed to two only. A gun-arrangement which gave three big guns
bearing in _any_ position seemed therefore far more reasonable on paper.
It stands to the credit of Sir N. Barnaby (or else to the credit of the
Admiralty of the era) that he recognised the impossibility of any such
manœuvres in fleet actions, but at the same time he also realised how
heavily it might tell in cruiser duels. Out of which the _Imperieuse_
and _Warspite_ were born.
Details of these ships:--
Displacement--8,400 tons.
Length (between perpendiculars)--315ft.
Beam--62ft.
Draught (maximum)--27⅓ft.
Armament--Four 9.2 24-ton B.L., six 6-inch, 89cwt., six torpedo
tubes.
Horse-power--10,000=16.75 knots.
Coal--1,130 tons = nominal radius of ten knots of 7,000 miles.
Armour--Belt amidships of 10in. compound, with 9-inch bulkheads,
8-inch barbettes. No armour to lesser guns. 3-inch protective
deck fore and aft, and on top of belt.
[Illustration:
SHANNON.
NORTHAMPTON.
ADMIRAL class.
“C” class.
ORLANDO class.
CHARACTERISTIC BARNABY SHIPS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account