The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
As Supplementary Instructions there were:--
(1) As to the behaviour and sea-going qualities of, or the
defects in, the new and most recently commissioned vessels,
as obtained from the reports of the Admirals in command of
the respective squadrons.
(2) The general conclusion to be drawn from the recent
operations.”
A summary of the findings[9] is as follows:--
“That to maintain an effective blockade of a Fleet in a strongly
fortified port a proportion of at least five to three would be
essential and possibly an even larger proportion, unless a good
anchorage could be found near the blockaded port which could
be used as a base, in which case a proportion of four to three
might suffice, supposing the blockading squadron to be very amply
supplied with look-out ships and colliers.”
Torpedo boats were condemned as being of little value to blockaders,
though useful to the blockaded. For blockade purposes the
torpedo-gunboats of the _Rattlesnake_ class were highly commended.
Attention was drawn to the large number of deck hands employed down
below on account of the insufficient engine-room complements, and
the excess of untrained stokers. The case of the _Warspite_ was
specifically mentioned. In order to break the blockade at sixteen
knots she sent thirty-six deck hands down below at a time when every
available deck hand would have been required above had the operations
been real war.
A special supplementary report was called for as to the sea-going
qualities of the ships. Considerable historical interest attaches to
this particular report, and the following extracts are especially
interesting:--
_Admiral_ class.
“So far as could be judged, these vessels are good sea-boats, and
their speed is not affected when steaming against a moderate wind
and sea; but we are of opinion that their low freeboard renders
them unsuitable as sea-going armour-clads for general service
with the Fleet, as their speed must be rapidly reduced when it is
necessary to force them against a head sea or swell.
“On the only occasion on which the _Collingwood_ experienced any
considerable beam swell she is reported to have rolled 20 degrees
each way; this does not make it appear as if the _Admiral_ class
will be very steady gun-platforms in bad weather.
“They are said to be ‘handy’ at 6 knots and over.
“In the _Benbow_ much difficulty was experienced in stowing the
bower anchors. This is the case in all low freeboard vessels,
more or less, but the evil appears to have been intensified in
this instance by defective fittings, and by the fact of her being
supplied with the old-fashioned iron-stocked anchors instead of
improved Martins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account