The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
The type of segmentation exhibited by the Crustacea is thus of a limited
character, concerning merely the external skin with its appendages, and
the nervous system, and not touching any of the other internal
organs.[1] In this respect the Crustacea agree with all the other
Arthropods, in the adults of which the segmentation is confined to the
exterior and to the nervous system, and does not extend to the
body-cavity and its contained organs; and for the same reason they
differ essentially from all other metamerically segmented animals,
_e.g._ Annelids, in which the segmentation not only affects the exterior
and the nervous system, but especially applies to the body-cavity, the
musculature, the renal, and often the generative organs. The Crustacea
also resemble the other Arthropoda in the fact that the body-cavity
contains blood, and is therefore a “haemocoel,” while in the Annelids
and Vertebrates the segmented body-cavity is distinct from the vascular
system, and constitutes a true “coelom.” To this important distinction,
and to its especial application to the Crustacea, we will return, but
first we may consider more narrowly the =segmentation= of the Crustacea
and its main types of variation within the group. In order to determine
the number of segments which compose any particular Crustacean we have
clearly two criteria: first, the rings or somites of which the body is
composed, and to each of which a pair of limbs must be originally
ascribed; and, second, the nervous ganglia.
Around and behind the region of the mouth there is very little
difficulty in determining the segments of the body, if we allow
embryology to assist anatomy, but in front of the mouth the matter is
not so easy.
In the Crustacea the moot point is whether we consider the paired eyes
and first pair of antennae as true appendages belonging to two true
segments, or whether they are structures _sui generis_, not homologous
to the other limbs. With regard to the first antennae we are probably
safe in assigning them to a true body-segment, since in some of the
Entomostraca, _e.g._ _Apus_, the nerves which supply them spring, not
from the brain as in more highly specialised forms, but from the
commissures which pass round the oesophagus to connect the dorsally
lying brain to the ventral nerve-cord. The paired eyes are always
innervated from the brain, but the brain, or at least part of it, is
very probably formed of paired trunk-ganglia which have fused into a
common cerebral mass; and the fact that under certain circumstances the
stalked eye of Decapods when excised with its peripheral ganglion[2] can
regenerate in the form of an antenna, is perhaps evidence that the
lateral eyes are borne on what were once a pair of true appendages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account