The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)Warburton, Cecil
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 04 (of 10)
Warburton, Cecil
Animals
Now, with regard to the segmentation of the body, the Crustacea fall
into three categories: the Entomostraca, in which the number of segments
is indefinite; the Malacostraca, in which we may count nineteen
segments, exclusive of the terminal piece or telson and omitting the
lateral eyes; and the Leptostraca, including the single recent genus
_Nebalia_, in which the segmentation of head and thorax agrees exactly
with that of the Malacostraca, but in the abdomen there are two
additional segments.
It has been usually held that the indefinite number of segments
characteristic of the Entomostraca, and especially the indefinitely
large number of segments characteristic of such Phyllopods as _Apus_,
preserves the ancestral condition from which the definite number found
in the Malacostraca has been derived; but recently it has been clearly
pointed out by Professor Carpenter[3] that the number of segments found
in the Malacostraca and Leptostraca corresponds with extraordinary
exactitude to the number determined as typical in all the other orders
of Arthropoda. This remarkable correspondence (it can hardly be
coincidence) seems to point to a common Arthropodan plan of
segmentation, lying at the very root of the phyletic tree; and if this
is so, we are forced to the conclusion that the Malacostraca have
retained the primitive type of segmentation in far greater perfection
than the Entomostraca, in some of which many segments have been added,
_e.g._ Phyllopoda, while in others segments have been suppressed, _e.g._
Cladocera, Ostracoda. It may be objected to this view of the primitive
condition of segmentation in the Crustacea that the Trilobites, which
for various reasons are regarded as related to the ancestral
Crustaceans, exhibit an indefinite and often very high number of
segments; but, as Professor Carpenter has pointed out, the oldest and
most primitive of Trilobites, such as _Olenellus_, possessed few
segments which increase as we pass from Cambrian to Carboniferous
genera.
The following table shows the segmentation of the body in the
Malacostraca, as compared with that of _Limulus_ (cf. p. 263), Insecta,
the primitive Myriapod _Scolopendrella_, and _Peripatus_. It will be
seen that the correspondence, though not exact, is very close,
especially in the first four columns, the number of segments in
_Peripatus_ being very variable in the different species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account