The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition — John Shaqi
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
The Emperor leads up and hands to Ney two regiments
of grenadiers and two of chasseurs 317
They are formed in columns of battalions and march
in _échelon_, the right in advance 317
Premature attack of a body of French horse on the
left of the Guard 317
No support furnished by Reille 318
Admirable conduct of d’Erlon 318
The leading battalions of the Guard strike Maitland’s
brigade of guards 319
Captain Powell’s account 319
The leading battalions of the Guard are beaten 320
General Maitland’s account 321
Skilful and gallant conduct of Sir C. Halkett 322
The left and rear battalions of the Guard continue
to advance 323
But are attacked in flank by the 52d regiment 324
And are completely overthrown 324
The failure of the attack largely due to the absence
of supports 324
Arrival of the van of Zieten’s Corps on the field 324
The French right wing retires in confusion 325
Charge of the cavalry-brigades of Vivian and Vandeleur 325
Exertions of Napoleon to restore order 325
He is finally forced to retire 326
The French retreat blocked at Genappe 326
The result of the battle due to the intervention of
the Prussians 327
Probable course of Zieten if Grouchy had detained
Bülow and Pirch I. 328
Grouchy, however, not solely responsible for the defeat 328
NOTES TO CHAPTER XVI 329
1. The French tactics generally censured 329
Napoleon and Ney both to blame 329
Injurious effect on the French chances of success of
Napoleon’s absence at Planchenoit 330
The attack on Hougomont criticised 330
The defence of Planchenoit praised 331
2. The English tactics exceedingly good 331
3. The attack of the Imperial Guard 331
A. No foundation for the hypothesis of two columns 332
B. The claims of the 52d regiment considered 333
The notion that it was only the skirmishers of the
Imperial Guard who were driven off by Maitland’s
brigade refuted by the testimony of eye
witnesses 334
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account