The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
[574] This despatch is not in existence, but its receipt was
acknowledged and the above statement in it was referred to in Soult’s
despatch to Grouchy, dated 1 P.M., June 18th. From Grouchy’s statement
that he was going to Sart-à-Walhain, Soult drew the inference that he
was going to Corbaix or to Wavre.
[575] Gérard: Dern. Obs., pp. 13, 14; Letter of General Exelmans.
[576] Grouchy Mém., vol. 4, pp. 62, 63.
[577] There is in the Grouchy Mémoires, vol. 4, pp. 65, 66, what
purports to be a copy of a despatch to the Emperor dated Gembloux,
3 A.M. But its authenticity is more than doubtful. _Cf._ La Tour
d’Auvergne, p. 318, n. It begins with the statement that all Grouchy’s
reports and information confirm the idea that the Prussians are
retiring on Brussels, to concentrate there, or to deliver battle after
being united to the English.
[578] Charras, vol. 2, pp. 33, 55. Charras seems to us to be in error
in supposing that Grouchy’s uncertainty still existed on the morning of
the 18th. He has, perhaps, overlooked the statement in Grouchy’s order
to Pajol, dated at daybreak, quoted in the text.
[579] Gérard: Dernières Obs., p. 24; Letter of General Exelmans.
[580] Ib., p. 25; Letter of General Berthezène.
[581] Gérard: Quelques Doc., p. 12.
[582] We shall examine the English authorities in the Notes to this
chapter. See _post_, p. 280.
[583] Jomini, pp. 175 _et seq._
[584] 10.30 A.M., according to Charras, vol. 2, p. 62.
[585] Clausewitz, ch. 50, p. 146.
[586] Charras, vol. 2, pp. 57, 58.
[587] We reserve for the Notes to this chapter the consideration of the
various opinions on the consequences of this movement, had it been made.
[588] See Siborne’s excellent remarks on this subject,—vol. 1, pp. 318
_et seq._
[589] Declaration of M. Leguest, in the Grouchy Mém., vol. 4, pp. 141,
142. The staff-officer, by name Pont-Bellanger, must have left Moustier
several hours before Marbot’s officer, Captain Eloy, got there. See
Marbot, vol. 3, p. 407.
[590] See the Notes to this chapter.
[591] Grouchy Mém., vol. 4, pp. 71, 72. This despatch is given in full
in Appendix C, xxx; _post_, pp. 386, 387.
[592] Grouchy Mém., vol. 4, p. 75.
[593] Le Mal. de Grouchy, p. 15, n. 2: p. 59; Grouchy Mém., vol. 4, p.
75.
[594] La Tour d’Auvergne, p. 328. _Cf._ Grouchy Mém., vol. 4, p. 295.
[595] The one of these bridges which was nearest Wavre, that at Limale,
was passed at six o’clock by Valin’s cavalry, without experiencing
any serious resistance. Siborne, vol. 2, p. 286. Berton, pp. 66,
67. Marbot’s cavalry-picket occupied the bridge of Moustier all the
afternoon. Marbot, vol. 3, p. 407. _Cf._ Charras, vol. 2, p. 69.
[596] Ollech, pp. 208, 209.
[597] Berthezène, in Gérard, Dem. Obs., p. 25.
[598] Berton, p. 66, n.
[599] Charras, vol. 2, p. 44.
[600] Berthezène, in Gérard, Dern. Obs., p. 25.
[601] Charras’ discussion of this movement will be considered in the
Notes to this chapter: _post_, p. 284, n. 6.
[602] Charras, vol. 2, p. 69, n.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account